for
Cosmic
Fields
90
Summary
The presently disparate cosmic fields of
dark energy, dark matter, visible or ordinary matter, quantum electrodynamics,
and gravitation are examined by compressible energy flow theory and verifiable
explanatory compressibility patterns are found. For example, it is possible to fit thermodynamic
equations of state for each field.
These cosmic equations of state also
display a remarkable symmetry, except for one set of quantum linear states on
the pv energy diagram which intersect at
the origin point where there is a curious physical
discontinuity.
Shock wave condensations are proposed for
the origin of ordinary matter; the strong shock process for the baryons and
hadrons, and the weak shock option for the leptons and electron. The mass ratios
of the elementary particles of matter are found to fit theoretical compressibility predictions
to within about 1%.
Cosmic state interactions and
transformations are discussed.
Contents
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Outline of Compressible Fluid Flow
3.0 The
3.1 Visible Matter
3.2 Quantum Fields and Electromagnetism
3.3 Dark Matter
3,4
Dark Energy
3.5
Gravitational Field
4.0 Interactions and Transformations between
States
5.0 The Transformation of Visible (Baryonic) Matter to Dark
Matter May Yield an Accelerated Cosmic Expansion
6.0 The Problem of the Discontinuity
at the pvgraphical Point of Origin
7.0 Cosmology, Empirical
Science and an Integrated World View
8.0 Summary
References
Appendix A.
Maxwell’s Electromagnetic Waves and Compressible Flow
Appendix B. Summary of a Universal Physics
1.0 Introduction
At present, the cosmic
fields – dark energy (68.3%), dark matter (26.8%), ordinary baryonic matter
(4.9%), electromagnetic and quantum fields, and gravitation are partially understood, and they remain mostly separate theoretically or conceptually.
We offer an outline of the concept of compressible
fluid flow ( compressible energy flow) as a potential unifying principle for physical
cosmology.
Some previous
work towards this goal [1,2,3] has shown that basic quantum concepts, such as
Planck’s constant, the quantum wave function, the de Broglie wave/particle
equation and so on, can be expressed in
terms of the formalism of compressible fluid flow. In addition, the mass ratios of the
elementary particles of matter can be derived from compressible flow shocks and
their compression ratios – the strong
shock for the hadrons and the weak shock for the leptons.
Here we shall
attempt to incorporate the cosmic fields
into compressible Equations of State. We shall approach this with a brief
review of compressible flow fundamentals with emphasis on examples of how the theory fits various physical fields.
Naturally, such
an attempted overview of intricate and developed fields must be tentative, and
the present approach is offered as such.
2.0 Outline of Compressible Fluid Flow
The following is
a listing of some relevant basic compressible flow principles. For more complete treatment see texts on compressible fluid flow or
gas dynamics.[3, 4,5,6.7.8].
2.1 Steady State Energy
Equation
c^{2} = c_{o}^{2} −
V^{2}/n
(1)
where c is the
local wave speed, c_{o} is the static [i.e at V = 0] or maximum wave
speed, V is the relative flow speed, n is the number of ways the energy of the
flow system is divided (i. e. the number
of degrees of freedom) of the system and [ n = 2/(k− 1), where k = c_{p}/c_{v} _{ }is
the’ adiabatic constant’ or ratio
of specific heats.]
Here, ‘relative’
means referred to any (arbitrarily) chosen physical flow boundary. The equation is for unit mass, that
is, it pertains to ‘specific energy’ flow.
The case where V = c = c* is called the critical state. The ratio (V/c)
is the Mach number M of the flow. The
ratio (V/c_{o}) is also a quantum
state variable. The maximum flow velocity V_{max} (when c = 0) is the escape speed to a vacuu:
V_{max }= √_{ }n c_{o}.
_{ }
2.2 Unsteady State Energy
Equation
c^{2} = c_{o}^{2} – V^{2}/n – 2/n (dφ/dt) (2a)_{}
_{ }
where φ is
a velocity potential, and dφ/dx = u
is a perturbation of the relative
velocity. Therefore, in three
dimensions, substituting V for u, we have dφ/dt = V (dx/dt) = Vc, and
c^{2} = c_{o}^{2} –
V^{2 }/n − 2 (cV)/n
(2b)
(See also sect. 3.2 below for farreaching implications of the 2cV interaction
energy term in quantum state physics).
2.3 Lagrangian Energy
Function L
L = (Kinetic energy) – (Potential energy) =
( c^{2}+ V^{2}/n) – c_{o}^{2} , and so, from
(2b)
L = − (2cV)/n
(3)
2.4 Equation of State for
Compressible, Ordinary Matter Systems
The equations of state link the thermodynamic quantities of pressure
p, specific volume ( volume per unit mass v = 1/ρ] and temperature T. The basic
equation of state for ordinary gases
is the equilateral hyperbola of the Ideal Gas Law:
pv = RT ; p/ρ = RT = constant (4)
Equation 4 is
seen to be isothermal (T= constant) . For
adiabatic changes it becomes pv_{}^{k} = constant,
where the adiabatic constant k = c_{p}/c_{v}
is the ratio of the specific heats at constant pressure and at constant volume, respectively.
Here, each point
on the curve presents the values for a particular pressure and volume pair and shows how the two relate to each other when
one or the other is changed. In this
hyperbolic equation, the product of the two  i.e. the pv energy  has a constant value as set out by the
equation of state.
Hyperbolic
Equation of State (Ideal Gas Law)
Equations of State
can be formed for gases, liquids or
solids. Here, we shall be concerned mainly with those for the highly
compressible states i.e. for gases.
2.5 Waves and Flow
2.5.1 The Classical Wave Equation
∆^{2}ψ = 1/c^{2 }[∂^{2}ψ/∂t^{2}]^{ }_{ }^{ }(5)
where ∆^{2}
= ∂^{2}../∂x^{2 } + ∂^{2}..^{.}/∂y^{2}
+ ∂^{2}../∂z^{2};
ψ is the wave amplitude, that is, it is the
amplitude of a thermodynamic state variable such as the pressure p or the
density ρ. The local wave speed is
c.
The general
solution of (5) is
ψ = φ_{1} (x – ct) + φ_{2
}( x+ ct)
(6)
Equation 6 is a
linear, approximate equation for the case of lowamplitude waves
in which all small terms (squares, products of differentials, etc.) have been
dropped.
The natural
graphical representation of steady state compressible flows and their waves is
on the (x,t), or spacetime
diagram.
The classical
wave equation corresponds to isentropic conditions. It represents a stable,
lowamplitude wave disturbance, such as an acoustic–type wave.
Unsteady State ( Accelerating)
Compressible Flow
In compressible
flow theory, forces, when
present, introduce a curvature of the
characteristic lines for velocity on the spacetime or xtdiagram. Space time
curvature thus indicates velocity acceleration and the presence of force .
(a) Straight characteristics and path
lines show steady flow and absence of force.
(b) Curved characteristics and path lines
show acceleration and presence of force
In the case of
compressible flow and 3space (x,y,z) ,
a curved path line dx/dt = v (path) may be ‘transformed away’ to a
straight line Lagrange representation [ dh/dt = 0].
[Note: In General Relativity the analogous distortion
of its 4space (x,y,z,t) to obtain a force free representation is a tensor distortion.
However, it should be noted that
general relativity is a continuous field theory, and, as such, excludes
discontinuities or singularities such as shocks. Therefore, it appears to be
fundamentally incompatible with quantum physics.
On the other hand, compressible
flow as shown below in Section 3.1 on Visible Matter predicts shock
discontinuities as the physical mechanism for the emergence of the elementary
particles of matter by shock compression of an energy flow. Thus, compressible flow is compatible with
quantum theory whereas general relativity is not.]
2.5.2 The Exact Wave
Equation
Ñ^{2 }ψ^{ } =^{ }1/c^{2} ∂^{2}ψ/∂t^{2}
[ 1 + Ñψ ]^{(k + 1)
}(7)
where k, the
adiabatic exponent, is k = c_{p}/c_{v} = ( n + 2) /n; and ( k +
1 ) = 2( n + 1)/n = 2(c_{o}/c*)^{2}. Here, pressure is a function of density
only. This wave is isentropic, nonlinear, unstable, and grows to a
nonisentropic discontinuity called a shock wave.
2.5.3
Shock Waves
All finite
amplitude, compressive waves are nonlinear and grow in amplitude with time to
form shock waves. These shocks are discontinuities in flow, across which the
flow variables p, ρ, V, T and c change abruptly. (Note p = pressure, ρ = momentum).
_{ }
2.5.3.1
Normal Shocks
V_{1} > V_{2} (8)_{ }
p_{1}, ρ_{1}, T_{1} < p_{2}, ρ_{2, }T_{2} (9) _{ }
_{ }
_{ }
Entropy Change Across Shock:
∆S = S_{1} – S_{2} =
− ln(ρ_{02}/ρ_{01})
(10)
Maximum Condensation Ratio:
ρ_{1}/ρ_{2}
= [n+1]^{1/2} = V_{max}/c* (11)
2.5.3.2 Oblique Shocks
If the
discontinuity is inclined at angle to the direction of the oncoming or upstream
flow, the shock is called oblique.
Oblique Shock
V_{1N} > V_{2N}
p_{1}ρ_{1}T_{1} < p_{2}ρ_{2}
Since the flow V
is purely relative to the oblique shock front, the shock may be transformed to
a normal one by rotation of the coordinates, and the equations for the normal
shock may then be used instead.
2.5.3.3
Strong and Weak Oblique Shock Options: The Shock Polar
For each inlet
Mach number M_{1} ( = V_{N1}/c), and turning angle of the flow
θ, there are two physical options:
1) the strong
shock ( intersection S) with strong compression ratio and large flow velocity reduction (p_{2 }>> p_{1}; V_{2} << V_{1}, or
2) the weak shock
(intersection W, with small pressure rise and small velocity reduction.
Which of the two
options occurs depends on the boundary conditions: low back i.e. low downstream pressure favours the weak shock
occurrence; high downstream pressure favours the strong shock.
When the turning
angle θ of the oncoming flow is zero, the strong shock becomes the normal
or maximum strong shock, and the weak shock becomes an infinitesimal,
lowamplitude, acoustic wave.
2.6 Types of Compressible
Flow:
a) Steady,
subcritical flow ( e.g. subsonic, V< c), governed by elliptic, nonlinear,
partial differential equations.
b) Steady,
supercritical flow ( e.g. supersonic, V_{1}
> c) governed by hyperbolic, nonlinear, partial differential equations.
c) Unsteady flow (either subcritical or supercritical). These
are wave equations governed by hyperbolic, nonlinear, partial differential
equations. They are often simplified to linear approximations, for example to
the classical wave equation (5); if of finite amplitude they grow to shocks..
The solutions to
the above hyperbolic equations are called characteristic solutions. If linear, they correspond to the
eigenfunctions and eigenvalues of the linear solutions to the various wave
equations of quantum mechanics ( Sect. 3.7), or, equally, to the diagonal
solutions of the matrix equation of Heisenberg’s formulation of quantum
mechanics.
2.7 Wave Speeds
c = [ c_{o}^{2} – V^{2}/n]^{1/2
} (steady flow) (12)
c = c_{o}^{2} – V^{2}/n
– [(2/n)cV ]^{1/2 }(unsteady
flow) (13)
c^{2} = (dp/dρ)_{s}, where s is an
isentropic state.
Since V is
relative, it may be arbitrarily set to zero to give a stationary or “local”
coordinate system moving with the flow; this automatically puts c = c_{o}
and transforms the variable wave speed to any other relatively moving
coordinate system.
The shock speed U
is always supercritical (U > c) with respect to the upstream or oncoming
flow V_{1}.
2.8 Wave Speed Ratio c/c_{o} and The Isentropic Thermodynamic Ratios
c/c_{o} = [1 1/n(V/c_{o})^{2}]^{1/2}^{ } = (p/p_{o})^{1/(n+2)} =
(ρ/ρ_{o)}^{1/n} = (T/T_{o})^{1/2 } (14)
All the basic thermodynamic parameters of a compressible isentropic flow
are therefore specified by the wave speed ratio c/c_{o}. .
2.9 Relativity Effects in Compressible
Flow: In compressible flows all velocities [V or u] are relative only, and,
moreover, the wave speed c is a variable which is dependent on V and n; it decreases for larger
velocities V. and it reaches its maximum
value c_{o} at the static state i.e. at zero flow (V =0).
Interestingly, Equation (14)
c/c_{o} = [1 1/n(V/c_{o})^{2}]^{1/2}^{ } = (p/p_{o})^{1/(n+2)} =
(ρ/ρ_{o)}^{1/n} = (T/T_{o})^{1/2 } (15)
shows that the correction factor for the effect of flow speed
on wave speed c on the right hand side of the equation has the same form as the Lorentz Transformation of special
relativity. If n = 1 the two correction factors become formally
identical.
The differences from
special relativity are that the wave
speed c is now a variable and a
function of the flow velocity V, and that there is the energy partition constant n. Since the wave speeds are low ( c = 334 m/s for air at m.s.l.), the ‘Lorentz’
corrections for physical
compressible systems such as gases are
relatively large. Also, the flow speeds can exceed the wave speed (
supersonic flow), whereas in special relativity theory, the wave
speed c is a constant ( 3 x 10^{8}
m/s) which can never be exceeded.
Photon shocks are thus impossible in special relativity, whereas
in compressible flow they furnish a quantum physical theory for the origins of
matter itself via the formation of the
elementary particles of matter at compression
shock discontinuities.
2.10
Wave Stability
Compression waves
are the rule in the baryonic physical world ( i..e. in Quadrant I on the
pressurevolume diagram) where density
waves are always compressive and all compression
waves of finite amplitude grow towards shocks.
Here, only acoustic
compression waves ( i.e. infinitely lowamplitude compressions) are stable.
Finite
rarefaction waves and rarefaction shocks are impossible in material gases; only infinitely lowamplitude rarefaction
waves can persist.
We shall see
below that, with elliptical equations of state ( dark matter) and linear
equations of state ( quantum radiation), stable, finite rarefaction waves do
become possible.
2.11
Elliptical Equations of State and Rarefaction Waves
p
Elliptical Equation of State favours Rarefaction Waves
and Shocks
The criterion for wave behaviour [4] is the curvature ( dp/dv) of the isentropic equation of state:
1. If d^{2}p/dv^{2} is > 0 (i.e.
the hyperbolic curve) compression waves form and steepen, while rarefaction waves flatten
and die out. Only compression waves of
infinitely small amplitude (“acoustic” or “sound” waves” ) are stable.
2. If d^{2}p/dv^{2}
is < 0 , ( i.e. the elliptical
curve) rarefaction waves form and
steepen, while compression waves flatten
and die out.
.
We therefore see that ordinary gases are hyperbolic and favour
compression waves and compression shocks. No real gas is known whose equation of state is elliptical and favours
rarefaction waves; but we are now proposing that it is this elliptical relationship
which furnishes the Equation of State
for the Dark Matter of the
universe. ( Section 3.3 below).
We are also proposing that the third option , namely
the linear equation of state, fits
the Quantum state and the
Electromagnetic field. ( Section 3.2 below).
3.0 The Cosmic Fields and Proposed Compressible Equations of State
The main cosmic fields known to physical cosmology are:
3.1 Ordinary, Visible Matter (4.9% of the cosmos)
3.2
Quantum Fields of the elementary particles of matter, and the electromagnetic field
3.3
Dark Matter (26.8%) of the cosmos)
3.4
Dark Energy ( 68.3 % of the cosmos)
3.5
Gravitation
Of these, the
theory of the quantum field (including E/M) and the hyperbolic field
of ordinary matter are the most fully developed. In fact, of course, it is from
ordinary fluid matter ( liquids and gases) that the concepts of compressible
flow have been developed.
Here, we shall
briefly look at each field in turn from the viewpoint of compressible flow features
and put forward equations of state.
3.1 Ordinary
Visible Matter
Ordinary matter
consists of elementary particles held together as atoms and molecules by
electromagnetic forces. Atomic and
molecular matter can exist in three states as gas, liquid and solid. Gases are
highly compressible and all the laws of compressible flow apply to them.
Liquids and solids range from slightly compressible and distortional to completely
incompressible. All three physical
states can support waves. .
First, we examine
the question of What is Matter?
Here we shall show that compressible
flow theory gives a direct answer to this crucial question. Clearly, matter
is formed from elementary particles. But
a deeper or more ultimate question is: How
do the elementary particles themselves arise? Here we shall show that, if we start with
energy as a compressible entity, then
the elementary particles can arise naturally from compressible theory as energy shock wave condensations in a compressible energy flow.
A Theory of the Origin of Baryonic
Matter: Energy Compressibility in Shock Wave Condensations
We propose
that : All elementary particles of
matter (with the possible exception of the neutrino) are condensed energy forms
produced from hyperbolic equations of state by compression shocks. .
The forms are
given in terms of a simple, integral number n ( n = degrees of freedom
of the compressible energy flow, which
is roughly the number of ways the energy of the system is divided).. The experimental values of the ratio of the
masses to one another are then related to the maximum theoretical compression ratio
for each compression shock. ( Eq. 16 below). The observed fit is to within 1%.
A. Origin of Hadrons (Baryons and Heavy
Mesons)
Maximum Compression Ratio
m_{b}/m_{q}
= V_{max}/c* = [n+1]^{1/2 }^{ }(16)
m_{b} is
the mass of any hadron particle, m_{q}
is a quark mass, V_{max} = c_{o} n^{1/2} is the escape
speed to a vacuum; that is, it is the maximum possible relative flow velocity
in an energy flow for a given value of n, the number of degrees of freedom of
the energy form, This is a
nonisentropic relationship which corresponds physically to the maximum possible
strong shock. .
Experimental
verification values this hadron mass
ratio formula is given in Table A below.
Table A) Hadrons (Baryons and
Heavy Mesons)

n
n +1 [n+1]^{1/2 }Particle Mass (m_{b}) Ratio to
( MeV) quark mass
_____________________________________________
0 1 1 quark (ud) 310 MeV 1
quark
(s) 505
1
2 3 1.73 eta (η) 548.8 1.73^{ }^{ }
3
4
5 6 2.45 rho
(ρ) 776 2.45
6
7
8 9 3 proton
(p) 938.28 3.03 (1)
neutron (n) 939.57 3.03
Λ (uds) 1115.6 2.97 (2)
Ξ^{o}
(uss) 1314.19 2.99 (3)
9 10
3.16 Σ^{+} (uus)
1189.36 3.17 (2)
10 11
3.32 Ω^{} (sss) 1672.2 3.31 (4)
Note: Average
quark mass is 310 MeV; (2) Average quark
mass is (u + d+ s)/3 = 375 MeV (3) Average quark mass is (u+s+s)/3 = 440 MeV;
(4) Average quark mass is 505 Mev.
Comparing column three, the maximum shock compression [n+1]^{1/2 }],
to the final column “Ratio to quark
mass” we see that they closely agree, so
that the proposed origin of hadrons by strong shock compression theory
expressed in Equation 16 is verified.
B. Origin of Leptons, Pion and Kaon
m_{L}/m_{e}^{
} =
k/α^{2} = [(n+2)/n]/α^{2} = {(n+2)/n] x 137 (17)
where α =
1/11.703 = [1/137]^{1/2 }is the
fine structure constant of the atom , and k is the adiabatic exponent or ratio
of specific heats, k = c_{p}/c_{v} = [(n+2)/n].
Because of the presence of k, this equation for
the mass of the leptons is thermodynamic
and quasiisentropic.
We propose that the leptons are formed via
the weak shock option( i.e. they involve the reduction in strength of the fine
structure constant [1/137]^{1/2}
The experimental
verification for the lepton mass ratio formula of Eqn. 17 is given in Table B
below.
Table B) Leptons, Pion and Kaon
a
N k = (n+2)/n Particle Mass Ratio Ratio
(MeV) to x 1/137
Electron
__________________________________________________________
1/3 7 Kaon K^{±} 493.67 966.32 7.05
2 2 Pion
π^{±}
139.57 273.15 1.99
4 1.5 Muon
μ 105.66 206.77 1.51
  Electron 0.511 1
Clearly, column 2 values for k ≈ m_{l}/m_{e} (1/137) closely match column 6 for the mass ratio
reduced by 1/137, thus verifying
Equation 17 and the theory that the leptons are formed by weak shock
condensation. .
Summary
The problem of
the origin of the observed massratios of the elementary particles of matter to
one another has here been explained by
the compressible flow expressions to within about 1% of the experimentally observed
values. This grounds the creation of matter in either the strong compressible shock
for the baryons, or in the weak shock option for the electron and leptons.
. The principle
of the compressibility of energy flow, therefore, would seem to underlie all
material particles and the whole material universe.
Equation of State of
The Equation of
State of ordinary compressible cosmic matter ( gas and some liquids) is some
form of the ideal Gas Law, which a hyperbolic
curve on the pressure volume diagram:
pv
= constant = RT
(a) For isothermal
motions (T = constant) in a real
gas, the equation of state therefore
pv = RT or p/ρ = RT
Ideal Gas Law: A hyperbolic
equation of state for Visible matter
(b) For real physical gases
undergoing adiabatic
motions ( i.e.(no heat flow, dQ = 0) the general equation of state is :
pv^{k} = constant
(20)
These equations of state
all lie in Quadrant I of the pressure –volume field of Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Pressurevolume in Compressible
Fluids
Quadrant 1:
Real gases and Tsien/Tangent gas (exotic)
Quadrant
IV. :Chaplygin gas and Tsien/Tangent gas (exotic gases)
Equation of State of the Visible Cosmos:
The Hyperbolic Ideal Gas Law
pv = const. = RT
The Hyperbolic Cosmic Equation
of State of Visible Matter
Linear Exotic States: The Tsien/ Tangent Gas and the Chaplygin Gas
These linear
gases were first proposed by Chaplygin [8] and then the tangent gas by Tsien [7]. In this report we apply them in a much broader sense to
define the linear quantum waves. [ Then,
in conjunction with their orthogonal counterpart, they form a
set of transverse
waves having the form of Maxwell’s electromagnetic wave equations, as
we shall see below in Section 3.2.]
Linear
Chaplygin gas and Linear Tsien/
tangent gas
3.2 Quantum Fields ( principally
the Electromagnetic Field or the Field of Quantum Electrodynamics)
These fields
describe the subatomic world that produces the elementary particles of matter,
the hadrons and leptons whose assemblages form the atoms
described by the Schrödinger equation. These matters are described by quantum theory which is highly
successful, highly developed, and highly
verified.
We shall not
attempt any comprehensive application of the concept of compressibility of
energy to all the various highly
developed fields of quantum physics. We shall attempt only to show that, in select
examples, compressible wave theory can successfully formulate some important
aspects of quantum theory, implying that compressible action is physically
involved in some cases and at some level. On this basis, for example, we can see
the linear wave equation as a basic
descriptor of quantum electrodynamic phenomena . First the select examples:
The basic quantum
wave function Ψ Is the wave
amplitude. Then, , if the basic quantum
wave function Ψ is defined in a wave se as Ψ = c + v , then the interaction energy term 2cv
from [c + v]^{2 } = c^{2} + 2cv + v^{2} appears
in most of the fundamental quantum
relationships:
A. The above ‘Extra Energy’or ‘Interaction energy’ term 2cv then yields the following fundamental
quantum relationships:
A) Planck’s Constant, h
For n = 1, if cV = constant energy for each set of
waves, then cV/υ = constant energy per cycle or pulse:
cV/υ = h
cV = hυ = hω/2π =
ħω = ε_{υ}
And, for the
complex case:
cV/υ = ħ/i = −iħ
B)
De Broglie Wave/Particle Equation
cV/υ = h
But c/υ
= λ; V(m) = p (momentum), so λp = h, or
p = h/λ
C ) Lagrangian Function, L
L = 2cV
D) Quantum Wave Function
Operators
a) Hamiltonian Energy Operator
cV= − hυ = −ħω = ε
icV = − ∂../∂t, and so
cV = ħ/i ( ∂../∂t) = +iħ∂../∂t = H_{op}
which is the
Hamiltonian energy operator. ( To ensure correct dimensions, it must be applied
to the normalized quantum function ψ_{N}).
b) Momentum Operator
cv = hυ = +ħω
= ε
v =
(1/c))ħω, or (m)V = p =
(m)(1/c)ħω
Multiplying by i,
we have:
(m)iV = (m)(1/c)
iħω= (m)(1/c) ħ ∂../∂t
So, we have
(m) V = p = (m)(1/c) iħ
∂../∂t
But,
(1/c)
∂../∂t = ∂../∂x, and so
(m)V = p = iħ∂../∂x = p_{op}
which is the
quantum wave operator, ( to ensure correct dimensions, it must be applied to
the normalized quantum function ψ_{N}).
E) Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
cV = hυ; cV/υ = h
λV = h
But λ =
Δx and V(m) = Δp, so
Δx . Δp ≥ (m) h
which is the
Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
E) Origin
of Elementary Particles of Matter as Shock Condensations in a Quantum Compressible
Flow
This has been dealt with above in Section 2 on the origin of baryonic
material particles and leptons to form Visible
Matter and is repeated here for convenience:
We propose that : All elementary particles of matter (with
the possible exception of the neutrino) are condensed energy forms produced from hyperbolic equations of state by
compression shocks. .
The forms are given in terms of a
simple, integral number n ( n = degrees of freedom of the compressible
energy flow, which is roughly the number
of ways the energy of the system is divided)..
The experimental values of the ratio of the masses to one another are
then related to the maximum theoretical
compression ratio for each compression shock. The observed fit is to within 1%.
A. Origin of Hadrons (Baryons and Heavy Mesons)
Maximum Compression Ratio
m_{b}/m_{q} = V_{max}/c*
= [n+1]^{1/2 }^{ }(16)
m_{b} is the mass of any
hadron particle, m_{q} is a
quark mass, V_{max} = c_{o} n^{1/2} is the escape speed
to a vacuum; that is, it is the maximum possible relative flow velocity in an
energy flow for a given value of n, the number of degrees of freedom of the
energy form, This compression ratio is a
nonisentropic relationship which corresponds physically to the maximum possible
strong shock. .
Experimental verification for this
hadron mass ratio formula is given in Table
A Section 2. above.
B. Origin of
Leptons, Pion and Kaon
m_{L}/m_{e}^{ } =
k/α^{2} = [(n+2)/n]/α^{2} = {(n+2)/n] x 137
(17)
where α = 1/11.703 is the
fine structure constant, and k is the adiabatic exponent or ratio of specific
heats, k = c_{p}/c_{v} = [(n+2)/n].
Because of the presence of k, this equation
for the mass of the leptons is
thermodynamic and quasiisentropic.
The leptons are formed via the weak shock option
The experimental verification for
the lepton mass ratio formula is given in Table B Section 2 above.
Summary
Equations 16 and 17 give, uniquely
, an experimentally verified explanation
for the origin of matter as being a
shock condensation from a compressible energetic field., and for the
observed ratios for the masses of the elementary particles of matter. The
principle of the compressibility of energy flow, therefore, appear to underlie
all material particles and the whole material universe.
.
Summary of Compressible Flow and Quantum State Effects: We have been able to formally relate fundamental quantum relationships to a single
compressible energy pulse term, 2cV.
We have, in
effect, quantized the various energy ‘fields’ represented by 2cV/n for various
values of n, by equating them to the ‘timelike’ condition set by the frequency
υ in the quantum equation hυ = 2cV/n.
(Note that these
equations, as is usual in compressible flow theory, are for ‘specific’ energy,
that is, for unit mass flow. For a
definite particle, the numerical value of the mass is to be inserted; the
dimensions of the equations being not
thereby changed, since in our system, mass (m) is a dimensionless ratio. Thus
for the photon, we have hυ = m_{γ}
cV, where m_{γ} is the relativistic mass of the photon. In
terms of the momentum, p we have
hυ = cp,
which is the de
Broglie equation].
Considering the above relationships, it
seems reasonable to conclude that there
is something fluidic and compressible involved in quantum physics. We suggest that it is the compressible flow
of wave energy (c +V)^{2} which underlies this
apparent unification of the various quantum relationships listed above.
Quantum Equation of State : The Equation
of State concept has not at present been applied to all types of quantum fields.
The quantum
reactions produce baryonic matter
composed of elementary particles organized into atoms and molecules. We have shown
above that these elementary particles are associated with compressible flow shock
condensations. The appropriate equations of state for these particles would seen to be the quantum waveparticle equations
such as the Schrödinger Equation, the
Dirac Equation, the KleinGordon wave equation, the Weyl Equation , the de
Broglie wave particle equation.
However, for the
cosmic quantum electrodynamic field i.e. for electromagnetic radiation, we can propose as
its Quantum Equation of State the
following linear wave equation corresponding to the Tsien/ tangent gas equation
of state and the Chaplygin gas, but now extended
from Quadrant I into all four Quadrants:
p = ± Av ±B
which, for intercept values A = 1 and B = 0, becomes just
p = ± v
.
− v
Linear Equation of State p = ±Av ±B Linear Quantum Fields Equation of State
p = ± v
Note
The linear radiation cosmic
state equations p = ± v ,which
pass through the pvdiagram’s Origin Point,
raise a problem of thermodynamic continuity at the point where the wave or flow is postulated to move from
one Quadrant to another. A barrier arises at this origin point where the
specific volume v values and pressure p
must go to zero. Thus, the thermodynamic energy pv equals zero and the thermodynamic temperature goes
to absolute zero.
We must now ask How can
a physical wave of either
rarefaction or compression pass such a physically
discontinuous zero energy state/. Physical i.e. thermodynamic existence seems
impossible in this case.
These and other questions are troubling
because the linear wave equation of the quantum state is the dynamic link with
the other four cosmic states. In some cases it is the only communication within
and between those states, for example, of
the hyperbolic state with its isolated versions in all four quadrants.
The cosmic symmetry which would unify the various cosmic states via linear radiation
state interaction is broken.
To repeat, this is
clear from the fact that a state of absolute zero tempersture is required at
the origin point [since from pv = RT = 0]
. This thermodynamic barrier apparently prevents any
passage or transmission of a wave or signal through the origin from one
quadrant to another. The geometrical or mathematical symmetry remains, but the physical or
thermodynamic symmetry is broken.
[We should perhaps note
that the discontinuity at the origin in the case of the p = ± v wave
equation refers only to the physically real equation. In the case of a purely
mathematical or geometrical equation y = ±
x there would be no such
discontinuity problem since zero values
for the variables are permitted and the equations are then properly seen as mathematically continuous through the
origin point.]
Compressibility and Quantum Electromagnetic Waves : Evidence for Transverse Waves in a Tenuous Fluid
We have
indicated that some quantum waves are linear and are supported by linear
equation of state. Since there are two
such linear states one of which is adiabatic and the other which is orthogonal
to it and is isothermal, we then have the interesting possibility that this orthogonal set can support
transverse waves in form identical to Maxwells electromagnetic waves.
There
is a detailed discussion of this in: Appendix
A: Maxwell’s Electromagnetic Waves and Compressible Flow
.
3.3 Dark Matter
Some known characteristics of the dark matter are
as follows :
1. It interacts
with ordinary matter very weakly, and apparently only with the weak force. 2. It causes gravitational lensing of
electromagnetic radiation. 3. It clumps
to form denser entities more readily then ordinary matter. 4. It
appears to be denser than ordinary matter. 5. It makes up about 26.8% of total cosmic
substance. There have been no generally accepted equations of state for dark
matter. The reactions with neutrinos are important but not considered here.
In the case of
ordinary visible matter, we have stated
above that its state as a cosmic expanding fluid is approximately fitted by the
ordinary hyperbolic gas law pv = RT and that
its adiabatic form is pv^{k} = const. where k is the adiabatic
constant.
Proposed Elliptical Equation of State
State Properties and Dark Matter Properties: In the elliptical state, rarefaction
waves are demanded and rarefaction shocks are possible. This is seen to
be the opposite or counterpart to
visible matter’s hyperbolic behavior
which requires compression waves and compression
shocks.
Dark matter, if elliptical as theorized, may thus be a ‘form’ of rarefied matter,
interacting with visible matter only via
the weak interaction or possibly by neutrinos. Its rarefied forms would be the product of
rarefied shocks, both the strong rarefaction shock and weak rarefaction shock,
Its stable entities would thus be ‘rarefied
forms’, both strong and weak.
In the graph of the elliptical equation of state for dark matter, we have
shown the case where dark matter and visible matter contact one another at a tangent point in Quadrant This suggests a possible transformation from
one system to another, for example a
transformation from visible condensed matter to invisible rarefied dark matter.
In Sections 4.0 and 5.0 below we deal with such an interaction in some detail.
Depiction of the Conjunction of Visible
matter, Dark matter and
3.4 Dark Energy
This form of energy, filling all space, is currently calculated to constitute
about 68.3% of the total observable cosmos.. Because of its property of
having negative pressure, it is considered to act to accelerate the expansion of the cosmos,
according to its equation of state:
p/ρ = − 1
How do we depict this
equation of state? First, since the specific density ρ =
1/v, then we have
pv = − 1
While this negative
value for pv energy cannot be depicted in Quadrants I and III, which have pv always positive, it does fit into Quadrants II and IV as shown.
Negative values for compressible
energy pv = 1 In Quadrants II and
Quadrant IV
The Proposed Dark Energy Equation of State: To derive the corresponding equation of
state of which the −1 value for pv is a point, we note that pv = const is
an equilateral
hyperbola. This corresponds to the ideal gas hyperbolic equation of state in Quadrant 1, but now we are in the negative [−pv] Quadrants II and IV,
so that the Equation of State is
(p)v = const.
The dark energy’s
most striking property is its negative pressure, which fills the need
of physical cosmology to explain the observed acceleration in the expansion
rate of the cosmos. The negative
pressure property of Quadrant IV has
already been proposed [9,10,11] via
a linear extension of the
Chaplygin/Tsien/ Tangent Gas from Quadrant I down into Quadrant IV for the same purpose of explaining the observed acceleration
in the rate of expansion of the cosmos [See also Section 5 below].
[The theoretical possibility of a dark energy
state with negative energy but positive pressure also existing in Quadrant II exists, but its
properties and possibilities for physical cosmology remain unexplored.]
The dark energy’s
wave forms, being hyperbolic, would be compressive and compression shocks would
be permissible. Low amplitude, acoustic type compression waves of dark energy
would be allowable. Rarefaction waves of
dark energy would be suppressed.
3.5 The Gravitational Field
Characteristics of
Gravitation: The principal characteristics of
gravitational force to be properly
accounted for in a new theory are: (1) Its universal action on all mass entities,
(2) its exclusively attractive nature for
mass, (3 )its weakness relative to the electromagnetic force, and (4) its 1/r^{2}
decline in strength with distance.
The nature of gravitational force:
a) Newtonian and General Relativistic Theories: Newton very successfully described
gravitation as a force acting on all
point masses which fell off in strength as the inverse square of the distance separating
the mass points.
In his General Relativity, Albert Einstein expressed gravitational force as a consequence of motion in a tensorial curved space
time continuum. It was successful
in correctly calculating certain small aberrations from
Uniform compressible flow theory and special relativity have some
formal similarities. Both, for example,
yield the Lorentz relationship. [see Sect. 2.10 above ]. General relativity can
be seen as a limiting case of compressible flow when the energy distribution
parameter or degrees of freedom n approaches infinity so that virtual
incompressibility sets in. In this
incompressible limit the field acquires
a tensor character which can be related to nonuniform motion and their forces.
b) Gravity and compressible flow theory:
(1) This equation is universal
with respect to the other fields in that, since it is circular, it affects all four Quadrants equally,
(2) Because of its negative curvature [ d^{2}p/dv^{2}
= −ve] on the pv diagram, the gravity waves it carries will be rarefaction or dilatational ; as such they will exert an attractive force see (Section 2
above, under Wave Stability ) on any baryon
mass object they encounter.
In the above depiction, the radius of the circular
equation of state for gravity has, for
symmetry depiction, arbitrarily been
set at the dimension to give tangency with the hyperbolic equations of state for visible matter and
dark energy in Quadrants I and IV.
While the simplicity of the circle as an equation of
state for gravity is appealing, still, the conceptual schemes and procedures
for applying it to actual masses and the
other states are still obscure.
Undoubtedly, the concept of ‘centre of mass point’ from Newtonian theory
, i.e. the point at which all the mass of an extended body is concentrated for calculation
of gravitational force, will be
involved. The definition of ‘interaction’ and of an allowable range of interaction
intervals, for example at a tangent point between states as compared to an intersection
point, will need thought.
These and other implications remain to be explored, and the
uncertainty will remain until
observational data are available to support the proposed circular equation of
state.
4.0 Interactions and
Transformations Between Cosmic States
The possibility would seem
to exist that, at a tangent point or at an intersection, where two states share
identical values of pressure and specific volume, one state may transform into
the other.
Such interaction
concepts should be straightforward for visible matter and quantum fields where
so much work has already been done. Dark
matter and dark energy are more problematical, and gravitation, as has been
pointed out in Section 3.5 above, may be
more difficult still.
Elliptical
(circular) and linear states can (theoretically) exist in all four Quadrants
and assume different or exotic forms as
the numerical values of the state variables change sign. The possibility of these transformation might be open to experimental
verification on the local scale.
Sharp pressure
fluctuations or pulses would seem necessary for the pv energy point to cross
from one Quadrant to another as, for example , with linear and elliptical or
circular states. In such changes, one
state variable must assume the zero value for the pulse to cross from one Quadrant to another. Pressure pulses of large magnitude would
probably be of special interest in triggering state transformation of this type.
One example of a
cosmic transformation between quadrants would be the proposed Chaplygin gas
transformation from Quadrant 1, with its positive cosmic pressure, to a
Quadrant IV state where the pressure is negative state. This possibility has been
used to explain the observed
acceleration in the rate of expansion of the visible universe [9,10,11].
Hyperbolic states
are confined to one quadrant only. Our world of baryonic matter can therefore exist
in Quadrant I only.
A second class of transformations would be those from one state to
another state within a Quadrant, e.g. from hyperbolic to a tangent or
intersecting linear or elliptical state. Possibly
this transformation type may be open to experimental verification on the
local scale. At tangent points other interactions
may occur. For example, in Quadrant I quantum state interactions with baryonic matter interactions must certainly occur. We
explore the possibility of a transformation
of visible matter ( hyperbolic) into dark matter ( elliptical) in
Section 5 below.
Note: In the
above graph, State No.2 – Elliptical – has been graphed as being circular simply for
reasons of graphical economy, the difference between elliptical and circular
being simply one of a difference in the magnitude of the axial intercepts a and
b for the elliptical state , and being
equal for the case of the circle.
Interactions: Between gravity (circular) and all other
States.
Between quantum radiation states ( linear) and all other States in the same Quadrant
Transformations: From hyperbolic to elliptical in all quadrants, and vice versa
Fro m
elliptical in one quadrant to elliptical in all other quadrants
We see that
hyperbolic forms are fixed to a single
quadrant. This is the case with our world of visible, baryonic condensed energy type matter. On the other hand, rarefied dark
matter, if elliptical, as assigned here, might exist in four Quadrant
forms..
5.0 The Transformation of Visible
(Baryonic) Matter to Dark Matter May Yield
an Observed Accelerated Cosmic Expansion
Let us first assume that a
visible to dark matter transformation can occur, and that it yields a change of
state but no change in total rest mass. This leaves us with a need to export any kinetic flow energy in the
transformation system. We can estimate this exportable energy as follows:
K.E._{visible} = c^{2}
+ V^{2} +2ncV Assume n = 1
K.E. _{dark matter } = c^{2}
+ V^{2} + 2ncV Assume n
= − 1, then we have
the numerical difference, or net exportable kinetic flow energy,
in the said transformation:
Δ K.E._{transf.} = 0 + 0
+4cV= 4cV
Our question now is: Where does the exported energy 4cV go?
Since the proposed physical change is one
from the compressed energy matter of the visible hyperbolic world to a rarefied
energy of the elliptical dark matter the physical change must consist of a
pressure drop or rarefaction pulse. And, reflection will show that, while such a
large pressure drop could take either or both matter states to the zero
pressure line , still their energy
could pass into the negative pressure of
Quadrant IV only for a pulse in which there is no rest mass.
Now, in our equation of state proposed system, the state
with no rest mass is the
Such a transformed flow into negative pressure in Quadrant IV has already been proposed by a number of
researchers [ 9, 10, 11] to explain the
observed acceleration in the expansion
of the cosmos.
It seems supportive of our proposed cosmic equations of state and
state transformation hypothesis that it should yield a straightforward
physical basis for the negative pressure hypothesis which had little physical basis when it was first
put
forward [9,10,11].
We have thus supplied a
physical basis for a possible export of transformed excess kinetic energy from
Quadrant I into Quadrant IV via the
linear wave state, where it supplies negative cosmic pressure and merges with
the dark energy pool of the cosmos.
6.0 The Problem of the Discontinuity at the pvGraphical Point of Origin
The simplest linear
cosmic quantum radiation equations of state p = ± v which pass through the pvdiagram’s Origin Point raise a problem of thermodynamic or
physical continuity. A barrier arises at
this origin point where the specific volume v
and pressure p both go to zero.
Thus the thermodynamic energy pv = 0 and the thermodynamic temperature T = 0. .
We must now ask: Can
a physical wave, of either rarefaction or compression,
pass continuously through such a physical
discontinuous zero energy state? It would seem clear that that they cannot.
These
questions are troubling because the linear wave equation of the quantum
state is the dynamic link with all the four Quadrants of physical states. . In
some cases this would seem to be the only physical communication within and
between those states, for example, of
the hyperbolic state in Quadrant
I with its isolated versions in the
other three. The cosmic symmetry which would unify the various cosmic states via interaction
with linear radiation states is broken.
To
repeat, zero tempersture is
required at the origin point [since pv =
RT = 0] . This thermodynamic barrier
prevents any passage or transmission of a wave or signal through the origin
from one quadrant to another. The geometrical symmetry is physically and thermodynamically broken.
We should perhaps note here that the discontinuity at the origin
in the case of the p = ± v wave equation refers only to the
physically real equation. In the case of a purely mathematical or geometrical
equation y = ± x there would be no such discontinuity problem since zero values for the variables
are permitted and the equations are then properly seen as mathematically continuous through the
origin point.
Summary of Cosmic States
Note:
In the above graph, State No.2 –
Elliptical, has been graphed as being
circular simply for reasons of graphical economy, the difference between
elliptical and circular being simply one of a difference in the magnitude of
the axial intercepts a and b for the
elliptical state , and being equal for the case of the circle.
The understanding
that we have hopefully achieved is that cosmological structures and processes
involve principles of compressible energy flows and their interactions. The
cosmic thermodynamic state equations that we have proposed exhibit a strong
symmetry, especially strong for the linear radiation state which for the case of p = ± v pass symmetrically through the pvenergy
diagram’s origin. And yet, this latter
appealing symmetry is broken by the problem of a continuous wave or radiation entity
being unable to pass through the
thermodynamic barrier of pv = 0 at the origin.
This raises an unexpected , speculative, but rationally positive possible solution as follows:
1. Cosmic
thermodynamic symmetry is strongly suggested by the compressible equations of state; but this is broken by the discontinuity at
the Origin Point for the case of the linear wave state
p = ± v.
2. A solution, preserving complete cosmic symmetry, would
require the presence at the Point of Origin of some intrinsically unquantified dynamic entity.
3. But, an
‘intrinsically unquantified dynamic entity’ is, probably what philosophy would term a requirement for spirit.
4. Therefore, the
logical argument emerges that “if complete thermodynamic cosmic symmetry
exists, then spirit exists.”
This rather astonishing
but intriguing result is one for
Philosophy and Natural Theology. It rests logically, of course, on the appropriateness and validity of the
proposed scheme of cosmic equations of state. This scheme has been proposed to
explain facts of physical cosmology. If
the requirement for complete thermodynamic cosmic symmetry is discarded then
the above theoretical argument is also
to be discarded.
The argument, of
course, also cannot be compelling,
since experimental verification is barred, and it is therefore based on postulates and logic, and, any
deletion or defect in these eliminates
the argument. Still, it seems somehow persistent and calling for an answer. The assessment must be rational
with input data from the three disciplines of science ( cosmology), philosophy
and natural theology.
Conclusion
To repeat, if
complete thermodynamic symmetry is desired
for the cosmic equations of state, then the key quantum radiation
equation of state [ p = ±v] lacks continuity at
and across the Origin.
Therefore, if
this thermodynamic cosmic symmetry is
made a requisite, it may require the
introduction, at the origin point discontinuity, of an intrinsically
unquantified dynamism, which
is philosophically a spiritual,
dynamic entity,  in order to supply
dynamic continuity through the
origin from one quadrant to another and
so to complete the desired cosmic symmetry.
7.0 Cosmology, Empirical
Science and A More Integrated World View
In the previous Section 6.0
on the physical discontinuity at
the origin, we came to a tentative, very
unusual conclusion which invoked a philosophical
definition. This may reasonably seem unusual in a report on physical cosmology.
Therefore some additional remarks on this point may be in order.
The understanding that we have hopefully achieved is that
cosmological structure, process and cosmic states involve principles of compressible energy
flows and their interactions, and that they therefore show a common structure
and nature. Since compressibility is a
well established field of physical
knowledge, we should thereby have achieved some of the same scientific unification for
cosmology. But have we?
For there is an important
difference here. John
Polkinghorne [1below] has pointed out this difference between
cosmology and evolutionary biology from the rest of science. Both of these scientific
fields, he points out, employ all the methods of scientific inquiry except for one, namely experimental verification, which
is denied to them. The cosmos cannot be
experimented on and the evolutionary
past is not experimentally accessible either.
Still, cosmology is a true science and reaches valid insights and
valid and fundamental knowledge. Polkinghorne
also points out that in this respect cosmologists and evolutionary biology methodologically have much in common with philosophy and natural theology, which also reach their understandings [2 below] in the same rational intellectual manner, and yet are likewise denied the satisfaction of
experimental verification.
Thus, in a deep sense, when the results of cosmology are examined
by philosophers and theologians and discussed by them with scientists, all are
then employing the same
intellectual methods and the same tools
of logic and reason and all three stand on the common ground of reason. This necessary communality merits some thought, since in it we may have
the seeds of a wider mutual acceptance and understanding concerning various views of ultimate reality,
It may be useful at this point, then to rethink the situation
from the viewpoint that therein may lie the beginnings or the elements of A
Reintegrated World View , one acknowledging the distinctions and the
similarities of Science, Philosophy and
Natural Theology.
The fields of human theoretical
inquiry are commonly
taken to be Science, Philosophy,
Theology.
1. Science ( excluding Cosmology and Evolutionary Biology) :
Its data and scope concern the physical
world.
Its method is
rational, insightful [2 below],
mathematical and empirical.
Its verification or validation is rational and experimental (empirical).
2. Philosophy: Its data and scope concerns the entire word of
reality i.e .the world of being.
Its method is rational, insightful and logical.
Its verification or
validation is rational, critical and judgmental
3. Natural Theology: Its
data and scope are the data and conclusions from Science and Philosophy
Its method is rational, insightful
and logical i.e. as with philosophy.
Its verification or validation is rational, critical and
judgmental i.e. as with
philosophy.
4.Theology :
See Lonergan’s “Method in Theology” [2 below].
5. Cosmology and Evolutionary
Biology
Their
data are observations from the physical world.
Their methods
are rational, insightful and
mathematical.
Their verification
or validation are those of Philosophy and Natural Theology, namely
rational, critical and judgmental. Scientific Experimentation is ruled out by
their historical
and cosmic nature.
Thus we seem to have the
possibility of a merging of science at its cosmic margins with philosophy and
natural theology, and perhaps therefore the outlines of a Reintegrated World
View. The latter would eventually involve a general understanding and acknowledgement of the separate aims, methods and rational
validation standards for each main field of human intellectual endeavor.
The influence of such a rational and valid Integral World Vew on the multifarious areas of human
civilized activity artistic, social, economic, governmental
and politicalwould appear to be undoubtedly beneficial.
Section 7 References:
1. Polkinghorne, John, C., Science and Creation SPCK,
2. Lonergan, S.J., Bernard.
Insight: A Study of Human Understanding.
Philosophical Library Inc.,
………………, Method in Theology. Herder and Herder,
8.0 Summary
We have shown how a postulated compressible energy field and its flows can fit and unite the main cosmic
fields known to physical cosmology via
symmetrical equations of state. Clearly also, there are many known facts and
aspects not considered here. The proposed equations of state will have to
undergo much critical examination.
In particular, we would emphasize the need for a thorough
thermodynamic analysis for each equation of state and field, and in all four pv
quadrants in each case. The entropy behaviour in each instance is also of great
interest.
A caveat seems appropriate here. Namely, that the above treatment using
equations of state, although it touches on exotic and alternative states and
possibilities, is nevertheless always scientific
and physical. These alternate states in physical cosmology should not be an invitation
to uncritical extrapolation or
imaginative speculation. They do touch on natural theology and
philosophy and such matters have been
mentioned in Section 6 above.
[There is one persistent problem that remains. This is the matter
of the broken cosmic symmetry with the simplest linear wave equation of state equations p = ±
v, that is to say with the
set of linear state equations that pass
through the coordinate origin where the pv energy is zero. This problem can raises
extrascientific questions which are dealt with in Section 6 ].
+v −v −p +p +p
1. Power, Bernard A., Unification of
Forces and Particle Production at an Oblique Radiation Shock Front. Contr. Paper N0. 462. American
Association for the Advancement of
Science, Annual Meeting,
2. ., Baryon Massratios
and Degrees of Freedom in a Compressible Radiation Flow. Contr.
Paper No. 505. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Annual
Meeting,
3.
., Summary of a Universal Physics. Monograph (Private
distribution) pp 92. Tempress,
4. .
Shapiro, A. H. The Dynamics and Thermodynamics
of Compressible Fluid Flow. 2 vols.
John Wiley and Sons,
5. Courant, R. and Friedrichs, K. O. (1948).
Supersonic Flow and Shock Waves.
Interscience,
6.
Lamb, Horace., Hydrodynamics 6^{th}
ed.
7.
Chaplygin, S., Sci. Mem.
8.
Tsien, H. S. TwoDimensional Subsonic Flow of
Compressible Fluids, J. Aero. Sci.
Vol. 6, No.10 (Aug., 1939), p. 399.
9.
Bachall, N.A., Ostriker, J.P., Perlmutter, S., and P.J. Steinhardt. The Cosmic
Triangle: Revealing the State of the Universe. Science, 284, 1481 1999.
10.
Kamenshchick, A, Moschella, U., and V. Pasquier. An alternative to
quintessence. Phys. Lett. B 511, 265, 2001.
11. Bilic, N., Tupper, G.B., and R.D. Violier.
Unification of Dark Matter and Dark Energy: The Inhomogeneous Chaplygin Gas. Astrophysics , astroph/0111325. 2002
Copyright, Bernard A.
Power, September 2017
Back to Top
Transverse
Waves in a Tenuous Field:
Maxwell’s
Electromagnetic Waves and Compressible Flow
,
Compressibility and Electromagnetic Waves : Evidence for transverse waves in a tenuous
fluid
Here we shall
show that compressible flow theory and the two proposed orthogonal linear equations of state p = ± v can produce transverse waves in a
shear free compressible fluid, so as to fit with the established transverse nature of
electromagnetic waves.
( The following
insert is from UF pages) needs editing to fit in here,,
Material gases, being tenuous fluids, can only support longitudinal waves, that is
to say, waves in which the density variations ±∆ρ are
along the direction of wave propagation. They cannot support transverse waves
in which the density variations would be transverse to the direction of wave
propagation. Its was this inability of a
tenuous medium to transmit the transverse waves of light which led to the
demise of the old luminiferous ether concept.
We now ask: What is the evidence for transverse fluid waves in the Linear Wave Field with its mutually orthogonal adiabatics and
isotherms?
We consider a
simple pressure pulse ( ±∆p) in the orthogonal wave field:
A pressure
pulse ( ±∆p) in the Orthogonal Wave Field
The initial or static state
is designated as p_{o}._{ }When the pressure pulse ( +∆p) is imposed from outside in some way, the wave
field must respond thermodynamically in two completely orthogonal and
hence two completely isolated ways, namely, by (1) an adiabatic stable
wave along the adiabatic( TG) and (2) by an isothermal stable pulse along the
isotherm (OG).
_{ }
Spatially, the constant pressure
disturbance ( +∆p) must propagate in the direction of the initial
impulse ,but, since the there are two orthogonal components of the pulse are the
only way for this to take place is for
the two mutually orthogonal components to also
be transverse to the direction of propagation of the two pressure
pulses. Vectorially, this requires
an axial wave vector V in the direction
of propagation ( say z) with the two
pulses orthogonally disposed in the xy
plane. i.e. TG x OG = V which is reminiscent of the Poynting energy vector S = E
x B in an electromagnetic wave.
E
Electromagnetic Poynting energy /vector
A wave of amplitude ψ traveling in one
direction (say along the axis x) is
represented by the unidirectional wave
equation
dψ/dx = 1/c dψ/dt
Maxwell’s electromagnetic waves
Here, however, in
the case of our adiabatic and isothermal pressure pulses we have two coupled yet isolated
unidirectional waves, and this reminds us of Maxwell’s coupled electromagnetic
waves for E and B, as follows
dE_{y}/dx = (1/c) dB/dt and dB_{y}/dx = (1/c)
dH/dt
where c is the
speed of light, E is the electric intensity and B is the coupled magnetic
intensity.
Maxwell’s E and B vectors are also orthogonal to each
another and transverse to the direction of positive energy propagation.
Therefore, we have formally established in
outline a two component wave system in
theLinear Wave Field with (k = −1) which formally corresponds to the E and B two component orthogonal
system of Maxwell for electromagnetic wave propagation through space in a
continuous medium. His equations for E and B are
Curl E
= ∂E_{y}/∂x = −(1/c) ∂B/∂t
Curl B = ∂B_{y}/∂x =
− (1/c) ∂E/∂t
If we now
designate our Tangent gas as A ( for Adiabatic) and our Orthogonal gas as I (
for Isothermal) then our analogous wave equations would be
Curl A = ∂A_{y}/∂x =
− (1/c) ∂I/∂t
Curl I = ∂I_{y}/∂x
= − (1/c) ∂A/∂t
The two systems
are formally identical. Therefore, we propose that the medium in which
Maxwell’s transverse electromagnetic waves travel through space is to be physically identified as a Linear
Wave Field, having the above described
thermodynamic properties for adiabatic and isothermal motions initiated in the wave
field and initiated by pressure pulses ( presumably by accelerated motions of
electric charges.) The compressibility of the wave state now accounts on physical grounds for the finite wave speed ( speed of light), and
in addition wave motions in this
tenuous fluid medium are transverse, as required by the observations..
It is possible to
reduce Maxwell’s two equations UF equations to a symmetrical single wave
equation
∂^{2}E/∂x^{2 }=^{
}(1/c^{2}) ∂^{2}E/∂t^{2}
∂^{2}B/∂x^{2 }=^{
}(1/c^{2}) ∂^{2}B/∂t^{2}
and similarly
with A and I for our Adiabatic/Isothermal
coupled wave in the UF:
∂^{2}A/∂x^{2 }=^{
}(1/c^{2}) ∂^{2}A/∂t^{2}
∂^{2}I/∂x^{2 }=^{
}(1/c^{2}) ∂^{2}I/∂t^{2}
This is not
surprising since the UF with its k = −1 thermodynamic property is the
unique compressible fluid which
automatically generates the classical wave equation with its stable, plane
waves. The formal agreement of the UF theory with Maxwell is again striking.
Instead of taking our initial external perturbation as a pressure pulse ( +∆p) we should more realistically, from the physical
standpoint, take it to be a density condensation (s = ( ρ – ρ_{o })_{ }/ ρ_{o}
= +∆ρ/ ρ_{o}).
This will now result in a positive pressure pulse (+∆p) appearing in the adiabatic (TG) phase of the UF but a negative pressure pulse ( −∆p) in the
isothermal or orthogonal perturbation component (OG) . This perturbation is
represented by the two orthogonal sets of arrows on the pv diagram, one
corresponding to +∆p and the other set corresponding to − ∆p.
As the wave progresses the two orthogonal vectors also rotate.
S
The
physical ambiguity which results from a pressure/density perturbation in the
Orthogonal UF
An oscillating
density perturbation ( ±∆ρ) then results in an axial wave vector
having two mutually orthogonal
components ( adiabatic and isothermal ) in a density perturbation wave. This appears to correspond formally to the
Maxwell electromagnetic wave system with its two mutually orthogonal vectors
for electric field intensity E and
magnetic field intensity B.
We have thus established a case for the
compressible linear wave field being a
cosmic entity which transmits transverse electromagnetic waves through space. A
necessary next step will be to examine the field or state in relation to all the multifarious established facts relating to electromagnetic
radiation.. These must include the nature of electric charge, electrostatic
fields, the compressed fields of moving charges and the resulting magnetic
fields, etc. etc. Preliminary work has indicated that this additional
reconciliation will be successful.
Nite: The appropriate wave
equation for the compressible flow field, from which the quantum shock
compressions that generate the elementary particles of matter are produced,
would seem to be the exact Classical
Wave Equation:
Ñ^{2 }ψ^{ } =^{
}1/c^{2} ∂^{2}ψ/∂t^{2} [ 1 + Ñψ
]^{(k + 1}^{) }
where k, the adiabatic exponent is
c_{p}/c_{v} = ( n + 2) /n; and ( k + 1 ) = 2( n + 1)/n = 2(c_{o}/c*)^{2}. Here, pressure is a function of density
only. This wave is isentropic, nonlinear,
unstable, and grows to a nonisentropic discontinuity called a shock wave. It is at these shock discontinuities that
the elementary particles can form – the hadrons at the strong shock and the
leptons at the weak shock option.
In many quantum actions stable waves are involved, such as the electromagnetic waves. For these we propose
the linearised classical wave equation, as follows
∆^{2}ψ = 1/c^{2 }∂^{2}ψ/∂t^{2
}_{ }^{ }
where ∆^{2} =
∂../∂x^{2 } + ∂^{2..}/∂y^{2}
+ ∂^{2}../∂z^{2};
ψ is the wave amplitude, that is, it is the
amplitude of a thermodynamic state variable such as the pressure p or the
density ρ. The local wave speed is
c.
The general solution is
ψ =
φ_{1}x – ct) + φ_{2}( x = ct)
This equation is a linear,
approximate equation for the case of
lowamplitude waves in which all small terms (squares, products of
differentials, etc. have been dropped.
Summary
We have presented examples of a
close conection of compressible flow theory and quantum mechanics fundamental
relationships. We have related the formation of the elementary prticles of
matter to energy condensation occurring in compression shocks in a compressible
flow.
We have
assigned a Linear Equation of State to
the quantum fields of electromagnetic
radiation. This equation has two forms, one being adiabatic and the
other being isothermal. In the case wheer these two ewuations are orthogonal. the
resultant wave would appesr to be transverse
to the direction of motion.. Then, the transverse wave equations are shown to
formally match Maxwell’s electromagnetic equations.
Copyright, Bernard A.
Power, September 2017
Summary
of a Universal Physics
May 1992
SUMMARY
OF A UNIVERSAL PHYSICS
Bernard
A. Power
Consulting Meteorologist (ret.)
TEMPRESS
©
1992
PREFACE
The central concept of the new unified
theory of physics which is the subject of this book, is that energy flows and
transformations are compressible, and that this single concept makes possible
the unification of the presently separate fields of physics – classical
mechanics, quantum mechanics, nuclear physics, relativity and gravitation.
We may roughly characterize this compressibility
as : (1) the capacity of energy to exist in the form of various elementary
particles having varying concentrations or densities of energy, and (2) transformations from one particle form to
another take place via energy flows which involve energy compressibility.
The existence of compressibility has very
important physical consequences. For
example, it permits certain supercritical motions to exist which now provide a
longsoughtfor physical explanation for the existence of the elementary particles
of matter in their various massratios, for whole ranges of quantum and
nucleqar phenomena, and for their unification with other branches of physics.
Of course, a new, central scientific
concept, to be valid, must relate in a fundamental way to an enormous range of
scientific topics and experimental data.
The complete exposition of such a new theory in all its details would
obviously be quite impossible to accomplish in a single book, or even in
several; and, given the current high level of development and complexity of
physics, it would not only be far beyond the ability of any one individual, but
would undoubtedly tax the capabilities of a whole team of specialists. Still, any fundamental, new concept must have
a beginning, and beginnings are usually small – hence the present small book
with such an extended scope.
The evidence presented for the general
correctness of the new theory is both
theoretical and experimental.
Theoretically, Section 3 presents a new
physical basis for quantum physics which is compatible with the standard model
in most respects, by making use of the concept of energy waves, and
compressible flows and transformations. The quantum state variables are the
wave speed c and the relative flow velocity V; the normalized quantum wave
functions are c/c_{o} and V/c_{o}.
The energy of the wave function contains a
new energy term, 2cV, which in turn then grounds all the quantum relationships
on a basis of extreme simplicity – Planck’s constant h, the de Broglie
equation, the Lagrangian function, the quantum operators for momentum and
position, and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. The entropy is derived from
a basic, compressible energy equation, and this in turn yields the fine
structure constant of the atom α in an extremely simple manner.
Experimentally, the problem of the
massratios of the elementary particles of all matter is explained by the
compressible flow expression [n+1]^{1/2} to within about 1% of
experimental values. This grounds the creation of matter in either the strong
compressible shock for the baryons, or the weak shock for the electron and the
leptons.
In this book, mass becomes a dimensionless quantity – a measure of the degree of energy
condensation of the various elementary particles of matter.
In section 4, the physical basis for
electric charge is related to compressible vortex motion ; charge is then
related to the entropy and the fine structure constant. The results of the
optical experiments of Michelson and Morley are shown to be consequences of
compressibility. The refractive index in optical media is derived from the
compressibility equation, as well as Fermat’s leasttime principle for optical
rays. The experimental discrepancies in
some versions of the Fizeau experiment are explainable as shock phenomena.
In Section 5, the basic relativity
relationships, such as the Fitzgerald contraction factor and the Lorentz
transformations, are shown to be simple consequences of the compressibility
ratios c/c_{o} and V/c_{o}, which, as mentioned above, are also
the normalized quantum state variables.
In Section 6, the 2cV compressibility
perturbation term is shown to lead to a quantum theory of gravitation; the
nature and physical generation of the quantum of gravity are shown to be related
directly to the generation of the elementary particles of matter by the strong
and weak shock condensations of energy.
Mach’s Principle becomes expressed on the physical basis of
compressibility.
The quantum nature of gravity leads to a
deeplyrooted cosmology in a universe evolving through Unitary → Binary
→ Unitary transformations; this
process provides a solution to the current mystery of the socalled ‘missing
mass’ or “ dark matter” of the universe.
Experimentally, Section 8 resolves the
conflict over the cosmological constant; that is, it reconciles quantum
predictions of an enormous vacuum energy with the conclusions of astronomy of a
zero energy vacuum and a nearly flat structure for space. The observed early abundance of quasars in
space is explained by the new theory in an experimentally testable
prediction. The A → B transformation of matter yields an
energychange equation from which the prediction might be tested against energy
requirements for astronomical processes.
Since a new theory cannot be exhaustive,
the present summary aims to present to specialists only a brief overview of
applications and some preliminary results, so as to encourage and assist in a
more detailed examination.
Those already familiar with compressible
flow theory e.g. aerodynamicists, astronomers, meteorologists ( such as the
author) and so on will probably find Section 2 merely a review. Those
unfamiliar with it will hopefully find the Section to be a concise presentation of compressible flow topics
which will provide a key to the application of the new theory to their various
specialties in the later sections.
May 1992
CONTENTS
Section 1 Introduction
Section 2 Compressible Fluid Dynamics
2.1 Steady state energy equation
2.2 Unsteady state energy equation
2.3 Lagrangian energy function L
2.4 Equation of state for compressible
systems
2.5 Waves
2.5.1 Classical wave equation
2.5.2 Exact wave equation
2.5.3 Shock waves
2.5.3.1 Normal shocks
2.5.3.2 Oblique shocks
2.5.3.3 Strong and weak shock options:
The shock polar
2.6 Types of compressible flow
2.7 Compressible flow ratios and parameter k
2.8 Wave speeds
2.9 Wave speed ratios and isentropic ratios
2.10 Graphical depiction of waves and shocks
2.11 Wave stability
Section 3 Quantum Physics
3.0 General
3.1 Compressibility and quantum mechanics
3.2 Basic quantum wave
3.3 Interacting ( nonparallel) quantum waves
3.4 Curved characteristics
3.5 Quantum wave function
3.5.1 Normalized quantum wave function
3.5.2 The specific energy of the wave function
3.5.3 The ‘extra energy’ term 2cV
3.6 The ‘extra energy’ term 2cV yields the
following fundamental quantum
relationships
A) Planck’s constant h
B) de Broglie wave/particle equation
C) Lagrangian function L
D) Quantum wave function operators
E) Heisenberg uncertainty principle
3.7 Quantum wave/particle equations
3.7.1 Schrodinger equation
3.7.2 Dirac equation
3.7.3 KleinGordon wave equation
3.7.4 Weyl equation (neutrino)
3.8 Quantum state functions
3.9 Origin of matter and energy
compressibility
A) Baryons
and heavy mesons
B) Leptons,
pion and kaon
3.9.1 Experimental verification of massratio equations
3.9.2 Summary
3.10 Entropy and the mass ratios
3.11 Entropy and the fine structure constant
3.12 Quantum interactions and elementary
particle interactions; Graphical depiction
3.13 Radioactive Decay
3.14 Spin, reflection, particle confinement and
spinors
3.15 Quantum creation and annihilation operators
3.16 The ‘collapse of the wave function’ problem
3.17 Nature of the quantum wave function
3.18 Feynman diagrams and virtual particles
3.19 Dirac delta function
Section 4 Electromagnetism
4.1 The physical basis of electrical charge
4.1.1 Charge as vortex motion
4.1.2 Vorticity at a contact discontinuity
4.1.3 Entropy and electric charge
4.1.4 Entropy and pressure ratio
4.1..5 Compressible potential vortex
4.1.5.1
4.1.6 Electron vortex pressure
4.1.7 Model of the hydrogen atom:
A)
The rotational vortex
B) Compressible vortex
C) The hydrogen atom: nucleus + electron
4.1.8 de Broglie wavelength. λ_{de}_{B}
4.2 Electrostatic field
4.3 Magnetism: The compressed virtual photon
field of a moving charge
4.4 Electromagnetic radiation
4.5 The photon structure:
4.5.1 Cusp vector field
4.5.2 Photon energy
4.5.3 Photon speed
4.5.4 Relativistic form
4.5.5 Photon spin
4.6 The MichelsonMorley experiment
4.7 Some Optical Effects:
4.7.1 The refractive index N
4.7.2 The Fizeau Effect
4.7.3 Fermat’s Least Time principle for optical rays
4.8 The Sagnac Effect
4.9 The de Broglie equation
4.10 The Periodic Table
Section 5 Relativity: A Compressibility Effect
5.1 Galilean relativity
5.2 Special Relativity:
5.2.1 The Fitzgerald contraction factor
5.2.2 The Lorentz transformations
5.2.3 The relativistic Hamiltonian
5.2.4 The Einstein formulation of special
relativity
5.2.5 Compressibility formulation of special
relativity
5..2.6 Transverse and longitudinal mass
5..3 General relativity
Section 6 Gravitation and Cosmology
6.0 General
6.1 Force in compressibility terms
6.1.1 ‘Longitudinal mass’
6.1.2 Force in pressure gradient terms
6.1.3 Wave speed c
6.2 Derivation and dimensions of the
gravitational constant G
6.2.1 Gravitational wave speed
6.3 The gravitational quantum or gravitino
6.4 Force of gravity in compressibility terms
6.5 Exclusively attractive nature of gravity
6.6 A new force law
6.7 Equivalence of gravitational and inertial
force: Mach’s Principle
6.8 The problem of the cosmological constant
6.9 The ‘flatness’ problem: Ώ equals
unity
6.10 Actionatadistance : The experiments of
Aspect et al.
6.11 The hidden mass, or “dark matter”, of the
universe:
6.11.1 The equation of state has two forms
6.11.2 Rarefied or celeston matter
6.11.3 Local pressure lowering in vortices
6.11.4 Quasars in early cosmic times [ p >>p*]
6.11.5 Spiral and elliptical galaxies
6.12 Experimental text of the proposed A →
B transformation: Quasars vs. galaxies
Selected
Bibliography
SUMMARY
OF
A
UNIVERSAL PHYSICS
1.
INTRODUCTION
1.1
The whole of physics –
classical mechanics and thermodynamics, quantum mechanics, electromagnetism,
relativity, gravitation and cosmology – can be unified on the basis of a
single, theoretical principle – the compressibility of energy flows or
energy transformations. This
principle thus introduces a universal
physics.
1.2
It is postulated that all
energy transformations and processes involve compressible motions which are
governed by the laws of compressible fluid flow.
1.3 Energy always exists in a definite
physical configuration or ‘form’, such as a massive elementary particle, a wave
pulse, a photon, etc., but never as ‘energy per se’.
1.4
Section 2 is an outline
of some essentials of standard, compressible fluid flow theory. Sections 3 to 6
then apply these to some fundamental topics in quantum physics,
electromagnetism, relativity and cosmology, to show the universality of the new
theory.
2. COMPRESSIBLE FLUID DYNAMICS
2.1 STEADY STATE ENERGY EQUATION
c^{2} = c_{o}^{2}  V^{2}/n (1)^{ }
where c is the local, compressive wave speed, c_{o}
is the static wave speed or maximum wav e speed, V is the relative flow
speed, n is the variety of the energy configuration ( the number of degrees of
freedom) of the system.
Here, ‘relative’ means referred to any (arbitrarily) chosen
physical boundary. The equation is for units mass, that is, it pertains to
specific energy flow.
The case where V = c = c*
is called the critical state. The ratio (V/c) is the Mach number M of
the flow. The ratio (V/c_{o}) is
a quantum state variable ( Sects. 2.10b; 3.8). The maximum flow velocity V_{max}
(when c = 0) is the escape speed to a vacuum; V_{max }= √_{ }n
c_{o}.
_{ }
_{ }
2.2 UNSTEADYSTATE ENERGY EQUATION
c^{2} = c_{o}^{2} – V^{2}/n – 2/n dφ/dt (2)_{ }
_{ }
where φ is a
velocity potential, and dφ/dx = u is the perturbation of
relative velocity. Therefore, in three dimensions, substituting
V for u, we have
dφ/dt = V (dx/dt) = Vc
and
c* = c_{o}*  V*/n  2/n cV
(2b)
(See also sects. 3.6; 6.2; 6.9; and 8.10 for farreaching
implications of the cV term).
2.3 LAGRANGIAN ENERGY FUNCTION L
L = (Kinetic energy) – (Potential energy)
= ( c^{2} = V^{2}/n) – c_{o}^{2}
, and so, from (2b)
L =  2cV/n
(3)
2.4 EQUATION OF STATE FOR COMPRESSIBLE SYSTEMS
pv = RT ; p/ρ = RT
(4)
p = pressure, v = volume, 1/v = ρ, the density; R =
gas constant; t = temperature.
Equation of State
2.5 WAVES
2.5.1 CLASSICAL WAVE EQUATION
∆^{2}ψ = 1/c^{2 }∂^{2}ψ/∂t^{2 }_{ }^{ }(5)
∆^{2} = ∂../∂x^{2 } + ∂^{2..}/∂y^{2} +
∂^{2}../∂z^{2};
ψ is the wave amplitude,
that is, it is the amplitude of a thermodynamic state variable such as the
pressure p or the density ρ.
The general solution of (5) is
Equation 6 is a linearized, approximate equation for the case of lowamplitude waves
in which all small terms (squares, products of differentials, etc.) have been
dropped. The natural representation
ψ = φ_{1}x – ct) +
φ_{2}( x = ct)
(6)
of compressible flows and their waves is on the (x,t), or
spacetime diagram.
The classical wave equation corresponds to isentropic
conditions. It represents a stable, lowamplitude disturbance, such as an
acoustic–type wave. The exact form
follows:
2.5.2 EXACT WAVE EQUATION
Ñ^{2ψ
= }1/c^{2}
∂^{2}ψ/∂t^{2} [ 1 + Ñψ ]^{(k
}^{+ 1)
}(7)
where k, the adiabatic exponent is c_{p}/c_{v} = ( n +
2) /n; and ( k + 1 ) = 2( n + 1)/n = 2(c_{o}/c*)^{2}. Here, pressure is a function of density
only. This wave is isentropic, nonlinear,
unstable, and grows to a nonisentropic discontinuity called a shock wave.
2.5.3 SHOCK WAVES
All finite amplitude, compressive waves are nonlinear, and steepen
with time to form shock waves. These are
discontinuities in flow, across which the flow variables p, ρ, V, T and c
change abruptly. (Note p = pressure, p
= momentum).
_{ }
2.5.3.1 NORMAL SHOCKS
V_{1} > V_{2>}
P_{1}, ρ_{1}, T_{1} < p_{2}, ρ_{2, }T_{2} _{ }
ENERGY;
V_{1}^{2}/2 + h_{1} = V_{2}^{2}/2 + h_{2} = h_{o
}(8)_{ }
where h_{o} – stagnation enthalpy.
CONTINUITY:
ρ_{1}V_{1}
= ρ_{2}V_{2
}(9)
MOMENTUM:
p_{1} + ρ_{1}V_{1}^{2} = p_{2
}+ ρ_{2}V_{2}^{2
}(10)
EQUATION OF STATE:
h = h_{(s,p)};
S = S_{(p,ρ)}
(11)
PRANDTL’S EQUATION:
V_{1}V_{2} = c*^{2
}(12)
V_{1}V_{2} = ρ_{2}/ρ_{1
}(13)
ENTROPY CHANGE ACROSS SHOCK:
∆S = S_{1} – S_{2} = ln(ρ_{02}/ρ_{01}) (14)
MAXIMUM CONDENSATION RATIO:
ρ_{1}/ρ_{2} = [n+1]^{1/2}
= V_{max}/c*
(15)
2.5.3.2 OBLIQUE SHOCKS
If the discontinuity is inclined at angle to the direction of the
oncoming or upstream flow, the shock is called oblique.
Oblique Shock
V_{1N} > V_{2N}
p_{1}ρ_{1}T_{1} < p_{2}ρ_{2}T_{2}
ENERGY:
[V_{1N}^{2} – V_{1N}^{2}]
/2 = (n+2)/n [p_{2}/ρ_{2}
– p_{1}/ρ_{1}]
or,
1/2[ V_{2N}^{2} – V_{1N}^{2}] = c_{p}
[ T_{1} –T_{2} ]
(16)
CONTINUITY:
ρ_{1}V_{1N} = ρ_{2}V_{2N
}(_{
}17)
MOMENTUM:
p_{1}  p_{2}
= ρ_{2}V_{2N}^{2} – ρ_{1}V_{1N}^{2
}(18)
RANKINEHUGONIOT EQUATION:
Ρ_{2/}ρ_{1} = [(n+1)(p_{2}/p_{1})
+1] / [(n+1) + (p_{2}/p_{1})]
(19)
PRANDTL EQUATION:
V_{N1}V_{N2} = c*^{2} – 1/(n+1) V_{max}^{2
}(20a)
V_{1}/c* + c*/V_{2} = V_{2}/c*
+ c*/V_{2
}(20b)
Since the flow V is purely relative to the oblique shock
front, the shock may be transformed to a normal one by rotation of the
coordinates, and the equations for the normal shock may then be used instead.
2.5.3.3 STRONG AND WEAK OBLIQUE SHOCK OPTIONS: THE
SHOCK POLAR
For each inlet Mach number M_{1} (
= V_{N1}/c), and turning angle of the flow θ, there are two
physical options:
1) the strong shock ( intersection S) with
strong compression ratio and large flow
velocity reduction (p_{2 }>>
p_{1}; V_{2} << V_{1},
or
2) the weak shock (intersection W, with small pressure
rise and small velocity reduction.
Which of the two options occurs depends on the
boundary conditions: low back, or downstream, pressure favours the weak
shock occurrence; high diownsgream pressure favours
the stroing shock.
When the turning angle θ of the oncoming flow is
zero the strong shock becomes the normal or maximum strong shock, and the weak
shock becomes an infinitesimal, lowamplitude, acoustic wave ( described by Eq.
5).
2.6 TYPES OF COMPRESSIBLE FLOW
a) Steady, subcritical ( e.g. subsonic, V< c),
governed by elliptic, nonlinear, partial differential equations.
b) Steady, supercritical ( e.g. supersonic, V_{1} > c) governeddd by
hyperbolic, nonlinear, partial differential equations.
c) Unsteady (either subcritical or supercritical).
These are wave equations governed by hyperbolic, nonlinear, partial
differential equations. They are often simplified to linearised approximations,
for example to the classical wave equation (5); if of finite amplitude they
grow to shocks..
The solutions to the above hyperbolic equations are
called characteristic solutions. If
linear, they correspond to the eigenfunctions and eigenvalues of the linear
solutions to the various wave equations of quantum mechanics ( Sect. 3.7), or,
equally, to the diagonalized solutions of the matrix equation of Heisenberg’s
formulation of quantum mechanics.
TWODIMENSIONAL,
STEADY, SUBCRITICAL FLOW
(1 – M^{2})
∂u/∂x + ∂v/∂y =
0
(21)
where M = V/c and c^{2} = c_{o}^{2}
– V^{2} /n.
Thus equation is elliptical, and reduces by a simple
transformation to the
Ñ^{2}ψ =
0 (22)
TWODIMENSIONAL,
STEADY, SUPERCRITICAL FLOW
(M^{2}
– 1) ∂u/∂x  ∂v/∂y = 0
(23)
where M and c are as given in (21).
This equation is hyperbolic and reduces to the
classical wave equation (5) by a simple transformation.
UNSTEADY,
ONEDIMENSIONAL MOTION
(c^{2 }–
φ_{x}^{2}) φ_{xx}  2φ_{x}φ_{t}
– φ_{tt} = 0
(24)
where φ is a velocity potential, i.e.
∂φ/∂x = u, etc., and c^{2} = c_{o}^{2}
–V^{2}/n – (2n) dφ/dt.
In linearised form, we have the classical wave
equation in terms of the velocity
potential φ:
Ñ^{2}φ = 1/c^{2} ∂^{2}φ/∂t^{2 }(25)
2.7 COMPRESIBLE FLOW RATIOS AND PARAMETER K
V_{max}/c_{o}
= n^{1/2}; V_{max}/c* =
(n+1)^{1/2
}(26)
(c_{o}/c*)^{2}
= n/(n+1); c/c_{o} = [1 –
1/n)(V/c_{o})^{2
}(27)
n =
2/(k1); k = c_{p}/c_{v}
= (n+2)/n
(28)
2.8 WAVE SPEEDS
c = [ c_{o}^{2}
– V^{2}/n]^{1/2 } (steady flow)
(1)
c = [ c_{o}^{2}
– V^{2}/n – (2/n)cV ]^{1/2 }(unsteady
flow)^{
}(2)
c^{2} =
kp/ρ = (dp/dρ)_{s}, where s is an isentropic state
(29)
Since V is relative, it may be arbitrarily set to zero
to give a stationary or “local” coordinate system moving with the flow; this
automatically puts c = c_{o} and transforms the variable wave speed to
any other relatively moving coordinate system. (See also Sect. 5.2).
The shock speed U is always supercritical (U > c)
with respect to the upstream or oncoming flow V_{1}.
2.9 WAVE SPEED RATIOS AND ISENTROPIC RATIOS
c/c_{o}
= [1 1/n(V/c_{o})^{2}]^{1/2 } = (p/p_{o})^{1/(n+2)} =
(ρ/ρ_{o)}^{1/n} = (T/T_{o})^{1/2 } (0)
All the basic physical parameters of a compressible
isentropic flow are therefore specified by the wave speed ratio c/c_{o}.
2.10 GRAPHICAL DEPICTION OF WAVES AND SHOCKS
a) Waves, shocks and their various interactions are
depicted in the spacetime or x,tcoordinate system, which is also called the
physical plane.
b) State plane representation
On the state (c,V) plane the characteristics Γ^{±}_{1,2}
show as two sets of lines inclined at slopes of +(1/n) and –(1/n). The
normalised state plane has state coordinates (c/_{o}) and (V/c_{o}).
It yields all the thermodynamic variables of state from the isentropic ratio
relationships via the wave speed ratio c/c_{o } ( Eq.
30, Sect. 2.9).
2.11 WAVE STABILITY
Compression waves are the rule in the physical
world. Density waves are always
compressive in nature, and all compression waves of finite amplitude grow
towards shocks. Only acoustic
compression waves ( i.e. infinitely lowamplitude compressions) are stable.
Finite rarefaction waves and rarefaction shocks are
impossible in material gases; only
infinitely lowamplitude rarefacttion waves can persist. ( however, see Sect.
6.11).
3. QUANTUM
PHYSICS
3.0 The
standard model of quantum physics is one of the most remarkable achievements of
science. It explains an enormous range
of nuclear an atomic phenomena to a very high degree of accuracy, and is
logically quite consistent. Yet, for all
its success, it has some serious deficiencies.
For example, while it is very successful in describing
many aspects of particle creations, annihilations and interactions, it still
has no predictive power to specify the values of the observed masses, and the
massratios of the elementary particles – the experimentally determined values
of these masses must still be put into the theory by hand. Again, it requires the arbitrary introduction
of various fundamental constants, such as the fine structure constant of the
atom α, which are essential for its calculations, but for whose existence
or numerical value it has no explanation whatsoever. Again, quantum physics is still essentially
unrelated to classical mechanics, and although it can be related to
electromagnetic theory through quantum electrodynamics, this is so only for the
cases of the electron – the phenomena of the nucleus of the atom are as yet
still essentially unrelated to the rest of physical science in the standard
model of quantum theory. Yet again,
quantum physics has little relationship to relativity, gravitation and
cosmology.
3.1 COMPRESSIBILITY AND QUANTUM MECHANICS
All quantum phenomena are basically compressible
energy flow manifestations. The basic
energy form ( variously to be called a characteristic, enform, enray, ray, wave
pulse, wavelet, etc.) is the quantum wave function ψ which refers to a
single, compressible, enray pulse or wavelet.
More complex waves ( elementary particles, etc. ) are
built up from the linear enray ψ by superposition.
3.2 BASIC QUANTUM WAVE
The enray ψ is the linear, ‘characteristic’, or
‘ray’ solution, of the hyperbolic, linearised, approximate differential
equation called the classical wave equation ( Sect. 2.5.1; 2.6).
Ñ^{2}ψ =
1/c^{2} ∂^{2}ψ/∂t^{2}
; ∂^{2}ψ/∂x^{2}
= 1/c^{2} ∂^{2}ψ/∂t^{2}
Therefore, the basic formula for the characteristic or
enray is as follows:
Ψ = c ± V (1,2)
3.3 INTERACTING (NONPARALLEL) QUANTUM WAVES
..
3.4 CURVED CHARACTERISTICS
In the general case, characteristics may be curved in
spacetime, ( i.e. on the physical plane), indicating the presence of force and
acceleration.
3.5 QUANTUM WAVE FUNCTION
ψ = c ±
V
(1,2)
Here, V is the relative velocity and may be set to
zero, making c = c_{o} in the ‘at rest’ coordinate system chosen. (cf.
Sects. 2.8; 5.2). For an energy flow, c_{o} is 3 x 10^{8}m/s.
In general, ψ is complex, and we then have
Ψ = c ±
iV
(3)
3.5.1 NORMALISED QUANTUM WAVE FUNCTION
From (c/c_{o})^{2} = 1 – 1/n (V/c_{o})^{2}, (Eq. 11, Sect.2.1), we have
Ψ_{N }= c/c_{o} + i V/c_{o}; ψ*_{N }= c/c_{o} –
i V/c_{o
}(5)
For small V ,this reduces to ψ_{N} ≈ c/c_{o}.
The same wave speed ratio c/c_{o} gives all the isentropic thermodynamic variable ratios (Sect. 2.9). It also gives the Fitzgerald contraction factor of special relativity ( Sect. 5.2.1). _{}
3.5.2 THE (SPECIFIC) ENERGY OF THE WAVE FUNCTION
E_{ψ}
= (c – iV)^{2} = (c + iV)^{2} – 2icV (6)
E_{ψ*}
= (c + iV)^{2} = (c^{2} –V^{2}) + 2icV
(7)
For ‘mixed’ energies we would have no 2cV term:
(c + iV)(c –
iV) = c^{2} + V^{2} = [E_{ψ}]^{2
}(8)
(c+ V)(c – V) = c^{2 } V^{2 }
3.5.3 THE ‘EXTRA ENERGY’ TERM, 2CV
The term (c^{2} + V^{2}) in (8) is the
familiar, elliptical ,steady state energy from the basic energy equation (
Sect. 2.1). The
‘extra energy’ term 2cV in (8) can be interpreted as being a transformation of
the coordinate axes c and V , by rotation through an angle θ.
On the other hand, the energy term (c^{2} – V^{2})
in (7) is a theoretical oddity, namely a steady state, ‘hyperbolic energy’ with
no aparentg physical meaning. ( But, see Sect. 6.2.1). We may also note in
passing that, if the ‘extra enegy’ term 2cV is constant, then it, taken by
itself, has a hyperbolic interpretation, namely the form of an equilateral
hyperbola ( xy = const.)
Hyperbolic energy:
a) Steady state: c^{2} – V^{2} = c_{o}^{2}
; b) Unsteady : 2cV = c_{o}^{2}
3.6 THE ‘EXTRA
ENERGY’ TERM (2CV) YIELDS THE FOLLOWING FUNDAMENTAL QUANTUM
RELATIONSHIPS:
A) PLANCK’S CONSTANT, h
For n = 1, if cV = constant energy for each set of
waves, then cV/υ = constant energy per cycle or pulse:
cV/υ
= h
cV =
hυ = hω/2π = ħω = ε_{υ
}(9)
For the complex case,
cV/υ
= ħ/I = iħ
(10)
B) DE BROGLIE WAVE/PARTICLE EQUATION
cV/υ
= h
But c/υ =
λ; V(m) = p (momentum), so
λp = h, or
p =
h/λ (11)
C) LAGANGIAN FUNCTION, L
L =
2cV (see Sect. 2.3)
See also Sect. 4.7.3. for application to
D) QUANTUM WAVE FUNCTION OPERATORS:
a)
HAMILTONIAN ENERGY
cV=
hυ = ħω = ε
icV =
iħω
But
iω = ∂../∂t, and so cV = h/I ∂../∂t = +iħ∂../∂t = H_{op}
which is the Hamiltonian energy operator.
( To ensure correct dimensions, it must be applied to
the normalized quantum function ψ_{N}).
b) MOMENTUM
cv = hυ =
+hω = ε
V = (1/c))ħω,
or (m)V = p = (m)(1/c)ħω
Multiplying by i, we have:
(m)iV = (m)(1/c) iħω
= (m)(1/c)
ħ ∂../∂t
So, we have
(m) V = p = (m)(1/c) iħ
∂../∂t
But,
I1/c)
∂../∂t = ∂../∂x, and so
(m)V = p = iħ∂../∂x = p_{op }(15)
which is the quantum wave operator, ( to ensure
correct dimensions, it must be applied to the normalized quantum function
ψ_{N}).
E) HEISENBERG UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLE
cV =
hυ; cv/υ = h
λV = h
But x = Δx and V(m) = Δp, so
Δx .
Δp ≥ (m) h
(16)
which is the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
F) SUMMARY:
We have, therefore, related
all the above fundamental quantum relationships to a single energy term 2cV.
We have, in effect, quantized the various energy
‘fields’ represented by 2cV/n for various values of n, by equating them to the
‘timelike’ condition set by the frequency υ in the quantum equation
hυ = 2cV/n.
(Note that these equations are for ‘specific’ energy,
that is, for unit mass flow. For a
definite particle, the numerical value of the mass is to be inserted; the
dimensions of the equations are not thereby changed, since in our system, mass
(m) is dimensionless. Thus for the photon, we have hυ = m_{e} cV,
where m_{e} is the relativistic mass of the electron. In terms of the
momentum, we have
hυ = cp,
which is the de Broglie equation (Eq.11).
3.7 QUANTUM WAVE/PARTICLE EQUATIONS
The quantum operators for momentum and Hamiltonian
energy in Sect. 3.6 D then lead to the various standard quantum wave equations
for the elementary particles:
3.7.1 SCHRODINGER EQUATION
For a nonrelativistic, spinless particle we have
ħ^{2}/2m
Ñ^{2}ψ = iħ Ñψ/∂t
(17)
3.7.2 DIRAC EQUATION
Eψ + c(α . p )ψ + m_{o}c_{o}^{2}βψ = 0
Or,
iħ∂ψ/∂t
= iħcα . Ñψ + m_{o}c^{2}βψ = 0
(18)
where α_{1}^{2} = α_{2}^{2}
= α_{3}^{2} ; β = 1.
3.7.3 KLEINGORDON EQUATION
For a relativistic, but spinless particle, we have
Ñ^{2}ψ =
1/c^{2} ∂^{2}ψ/∂t^{2} _{ }[m_{o}c/h]^{2}
ψ
19)
3.7.4 WEYL
EQUATION (NEUTRINO)
For a massless, spin onehalf particle we have
Iħ ∂ψ/∂t = iħ cα . Ñψ
Or,
Iħ
∂ψ/ t = (σ . p)
ψ
(20)
3.8 QUANTUM STATE FUNCTIONS
The quantum state functions are the normalized form of
the state variables, namely c/c_{o} and V/c_{o}. The state
plane characteristics Γ^{±} (see Sect. 2.10 b) are:
Γ^{+}
: dc/dV = +1/n; Γ^{} :
dc/dV = 1/n
The isentropic ratios can be obtained from c/c_{o},
just as in Sect. 2.9.
3.9 THE ORIGIN OF MATTER: ENERGY COMPRESSIBILITY
All elementary particles of matter (with the possible exception of the neutrino) are
condensed energy forms. The forms are given in terms of a simple, integral
number n ( n = degrees of freedom of the compressible energy flow):
A. BARYONS AND HEAVY MESONS
m_{b}/m_{q}
= V_{max}/c* = [n+1]^{1/2
}(21)
m_{b} is the mass of any baryon particle, m_{q}
is a quark mass, V_{max} = c_{o} n^{1/2} is the escape
speed to a vacuum; that is, it is the maximum possible relative flow velocity
in an energy flow for a given value of n, the number of degrees of freedom of
the energy form, (see Sect. 2.7 for compressible flow velocity ratios). This is a nonisentropic relationship, and it
corresponds physically to the maximum possible strong shock. (See Sects.
2.5.3.3 and 3.13).
Experimental verification for thisw baryon mass ratio
formula is given in Table 3.9.1A below.
B. LEPTONS, PION AND KAON
m_{L}/m_{e}^{
} =
k/α^{2} = [(n+2)/n]/α^{2} = {(n+2)/n] x
137
(22)
where α = 1/11.703 is the fine structure
constant, and k is the adiabatic exponent or ratio of specific heats, k = c_{p}/c_{v}
= [(n+2)/n]. (See Sects. 3.10; 3.11). Because of the presence of k, this
formula for the mass of the leptons is a thermodynamic and quasiisentropic
one.
The leptons are formed via the weak shock option 9 See
Sects. 2.5.3.3 and 3.13).
The experimental verification for the lepton mass
ratio formula is given in Table 3.9.1B below.
3.9.1 EXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATION OF MASSRATIO
EQUATIONS (21) AND (22)
A) BARYONS AND HEAVY MESONS

n n +1 [n+1]^{1/2 }Particle Mass (m_{b}) Ratio to
(MeV) quark mass
0 1 1 quark (ud) 310 MeV 1
(s) 505
1
2 3 1.73 eta (η) 548.8 1.73^{ }
3
4
5 6 2.45 rho (ρ) 776 2.45
6
7
8 9 3 proton (p) 938.28 3.03
(1)
neutron (n) 939.57 3.03
Λ (uds) 1115.6 2.97
(2)
Ξ^{o}
(uss) 1314.19 2.99
(3)
9 10 3.16 Σ^{+} (uus) 1189.36 3.17
(2)
10 11 3.32 Ω^{} (sss) 1672.2 3.31
(4)
Note: Average quark mass is 310 MeV; (2) Average quark
mass is (u + d+ s)/3 = 375 MeV (B)
Average quark mass is (u+s+s)/3 = 440 MeV; (4) Average quark mass is 505 Mev.
Therefore, Equation 21 is verified.
B) LEPTONS, PION AND KAON
N k =
(n+2)/n Particle Mass Ratio Ratio
(MeV) to x 1/137
Electron
1/3
7 Kaon K^{±} 493.67 966.32 7.05
2
2 Pion π^{±} 139.57 273.15 1.99
4
1.5 Muon μ 105.66 206.77 1.51

 Electron 0.511 1
Clearly, k ≈ m_{l}/m_{e}
(1/137), verifying Equation (22).
The lepton/meson mas
s formula (22) for a weak shock condensation also has
a thermodynamic interpretation:
m_{L}/m_{e}^{} = c_{p}/c_{v}
1/α^{2
}(23)
α^{2} = m_{l}/m_{e}^{} c_{p}/c_{v} [ ΔT/ΔT] = (ΔQ_{L+})_{p}/(ΔQ_{e}) = 1/137 (24)_{}
3.9.2 SUMMARY
Equations 21 and 22 give, for the first time, an
experimentally verified explanation for
the origin of matter, and for the observed ratios for the masses of the
elementary particles of matter. The principle of the compressibility of
energy flow, therefore, underlines all material particles and the whole
material universe.
\The text of Summary of a Universal Physics has been revised to this point as of
Sept. 29/03. The remaining sections which were composed in 1992 and previous
years will be successively reviewed and revised as necessary in future Website
Updates.
3.10 ENTROPY AND THE MASS RATIOS
If the entropy is taken to a binary logarithmic base,
that is, if
S = log_{2}
n
(25)
Where n =1,2,3,….., and if these values for S are then
compared with the values of [n+1]^{1/2}, which give the baryon and heavy meson mass ratios from Eqn. (21), we
see that there is only one value for n which gives the same value to S as
computed and for [n+1+]^{1/2}. This is n = 8, the value for n for the
proton (Sect. 3.9.1). We then have
[8+1]^{1/2}
= 9^{1/2} = 3 = m_{b}/m_{q}
log_{2}
8 = 3 = S_{(n=8)}
The proton is the most stable elementary particle of
nature, whereas all other baryons have fleeting lifetimes. It appears that n = 8 is a unique value,
since it is only for this value that the binary logarithmic formula for
computing the entropy gives a value
which equals tke necessary baryon mass condensation ratio [n+1]^{1/2}.
This unique equality may underlie the observed stability of the proton.
aryon particles.
3.11 ENTROPY AND THE FINE STRUCTURE CONSTANT
The fine structure constant of the atom α =
1/11.706 is the fundamental electron/photon interaction, or coupling constant. Its square is approximately 1/137,
and this number determines the probability of emission and absorption of
photons in electromagnetic interactions.
We recall that entropy is given by S = ln n, dS =
dn/n/ and ΔS = Δn/n, n being a large number. However, at the elementary particle level, n, the number of degrees of freedom
of the compressible energy flow, is small;
typically n equals 1 to 8 (see Sect. 3.9.1). This would suggest that
entropy change here is given by
Δs =
Δn/n
For example by ½ 1/3, 1/3 1/4, and so on, the value
of Δn being unity.
However, in compressible flow, the entropy change
ΔS accompanying any nonisentropic process, such as a shock transition or
a contact discontinuity, would be given by a formula such as the following one:
S_{y} – S_{x} = ΔS = ln(1+P) – k
ln(1 +((k + 1)/2k))P) + k ln(21+ ((k1)/2k))P)
Where k is c_{p}/c_{v} and P is the
shock strength expressed in terms of the pressure rise across the shock p_{y}/p_{x }and is given by
P = p_{y}/p_{x}
– 1
If the shock is very weak ( and this would correspond
to electromagnetic interactions controlled by 1/137), then the following
approximation applies:
Δs/R = [S_{y}
– S_{x}] = 1/12 (k1)/k^{2}
p^{3} – 1/8 (k+1)/k^{2}
p^{4} + …..
Now the mean value of the first term factor which
multiplies p^{3} , computed over a range of values of k corresponding
to n varying from 1 to7 is 1/11.6907;
this is within about one part in a thousand of the accepted value for
α, the fine structure constant.
It is even more interesting that, if we suppose that
the formation of proton plus electron involves an ‘allpossiblepaths’ entropy,
and then compute this for n = 8 (proton) and n = 9 ( i.e. (n +1), we get
ΔS = [ln
8! + ln 9!)/2 =  1/11.703215 ≈ α
(28)
The experimental value for α is about
1/11.706244, so that this extraordinarily simple calculation gives a
theoretical computed value for α to within 3 parts in 10^{4}.
Again, various shock formulae also give values which
are quite close to the experimental value for α when n in the range
indicated. Further refinement of this new approach to a derivation of the fine
structure constant α on physical compressibility grounds in the stanounds
is left to specialists in quantum perturbation theory and charge
renormalization.
It should also be noted here that the supposition of
the involvement of shock transitions in particle structure also imposes a
physical limitation to the close approach of electrons to one another, as is
actually required on theoretical grounds in the standard model of quantum
electrodynamics in order to avoid the problem of infinities in charge
renormalization procedures.
On the state plane, we see that a change in entropy
ΔS plots as a rotation of the state plane characteristic Γ through an
angle θ as the value of n changes (Sect. 3.8).
3.12 QUANTUM INTERACTIONS AND ELEMENTARY PARTICLE
GENERATION: GRAPHICAL DEPICTION
Two interacting enrays or quantum functions of the
same family (ψ^{+}_{1,2}) form a finiteamplitude, third
wave which immediately grows to form a shock (δ^{+}_{s}),
( see Sect. 2.10).
Two interacting shocks (δ^{+}_{1,2})
produce a third shock (See Sect. 2.9.1).
If the interacting shocks are quarks (q^{+}_{1,2})
the resulting elementary particle formed is a roton or neutron (p,n) .
These interactions are in order of increasing strength.
Continuity requirements and entropy considerations
require that the proton generation process also produces a contact
discontinuity (D) which is the physical basis for the electron (e^{})
Sect. 4.1.1), as well as a balancing, simple rarefaction wave R which is the
source of the (anti) neutrino (ν) Sect. 2.10).
The u,d quarks combine twobytwo (q^{+}_{1,2})
in the above model to form the proton.
This means that the entropy changes involved in the process have a binary
logarithmic basis. (Sect. 3.11.1).
The mass ratios for the generating particle and the
generated particle are in the ratio of the shock condensation densities. For
the baryons, this is
ρ_{2}/ρ_{1}
= [n+1]^{1/2
}(21)
The leptons and electron form via the weak shock
option.
3.13 RADIOACTIVE DECAY
Baryon particles form via the strong shock
condensation (Sect. 3.9;2.5.3.3), with the condensation ratio typically being
specified by the parameter [n+1+]^{1/2} in (21).
Baryon particles decay via the weak shock otin (Sect.
3.9; 2.5.3.3);
The weak shock typically occurs when the back, or
downstream pressure is low. The
continual formation, reflection, reformation process for particle
stabilization, plus the two shock options underlie the observed probabilistic
basic for radioactive isotopic decay of b
3.14 SPIN, REFLECTION, PARTICLE CONFINEMENT AND
SPINORS
The interaction of two enrays produces the elementary
baryon particles by shock condensation ( Sect. 3.9). Total internal reflection
of the shock regenerates the enray pair, and the process is then endlessly
repeated unless and until the weak shock option is chosen, whereupon
radioactive decay occurs.
The particle stabilizes by confinement under total
internal reflections of the 2enray/shock ensemble at the refractive index
interface between the particle and the surrounding vacuum, (see sect. 4.7.1).
Each flow reflection generates a ‘flip’ or spin of
180° (spin ½) for a coupled , 2enray spinor, and a 360° rotation or spin 1,
for a 3enray set. (see Sectd. 4.5.5).
Each shock reformation (particle formation) entails
the choice of either the strong shock option ( i.e. particle stabilization and
continuity of existence), or the weak shock option (particle dissolution via
radioactive decay). (cf. Sect 2.5.3.3).
The spin is related to the number of enrays
interacting according to the usual formula
N = 2S + 1
The behavior of sets of coupled interacting enrays is
described mathematically by the spinor calculus.
The details of confinement and spin must be left for
the appropriate specialists to evaluate.
3.15 QUANTUM CREATION AND ANNIHILATION OPERATORS
In the standard model of quantum theory, these have
the following form:
A* n> =
(n+1)^{1/2}n+1>
The new theory equates the [n+1]^{1/2} term to
the maximum possible compressible flow condensation ratio (Sect. 3.9, Eq.
(21)), which specifies the masses of the baryons and heavy mesons.
In our compressible system, we designate each separate
energy ‘field’ which is to be subjected to the ‘second quantization’ so as to
generate an elementary particle, by choosing values for n, the number of
degrees of freedom of the energy transformation. Since the quantization also involves the
expression hν, (Sect. 3.6), where ν is the frequency kit is a
‘timelike’ quantization. ( For a
“spacelike” quantization see Sect. 6.2).
3.16 THE COLLAPSE OF THE WAVE FUNCTION PROBLEM
The physical act of measurement or detection of the
quantum wave pulse converts it to a shock wave, and this physical
transformation is involved in the socalled ‘collapse of the wave function’
problem. (See also sects. 6.3 and 6.10).
The probabilities involved in the selfinterference of
the wave function ( for example in the twoslit interference experiment) are
also associated with the extra energy term or wave perturbation term 2cV/n.
3.17 NATURE OF THE QUANTUM WAVE FUNCTION
The position of the new theory as to the nature of the
quantum wave function is one of scientific realism. That is, the quantum wave function represents
a basic physical entity of compressible energy flow, one which, however,
is grasped, not imaginatively, nor symbolically, but rather in the
intelligibility of its correlation with the scientific formalism of
compressible flow theory.
3.18 FEYNMAN DIAGRAMS AND VIRTUAL PARTICLES
The Feynman diagram ( and spacetime relativity
effects see Chapter 5) can be interpreted as depictions of compressibility
effects in the physical plane, which is the x,t or spacetime diagram.
The intermittent aspect of the existence of the
elementary particles (Sect. 3.14) is closely related to the virtual particle
concept of standard quantum physics.
3.19 DIRAC DELTA FUNCTION
The mathematical delta function δ corresponds to
a wave pulse discontinuity, such as a shock wave in the compressibility
formalism.
4.
ELECTROMAGNETISM
4.1 THE PHYSICAL BASIS OF ELECTRIC CHARGE
4.1.1 CHARGE AND VORTEX MOTION
As already seen in the new theory (Sect. 3.9), matter
has the nature of a localized condensation in energy density, with its
magnitude being given for the baryons and heavy mesons by the equation
m_{b}/m_{q}
= [n+1]^{1/2}
and with the condensation taking place by the strong
shock.
For the leptons, pion and kaon, he condensation is
given by
M_{L/}m_{e}
= k/α^{2} = α^{2}
c_{p}/c_{v} = (n+2)/n (1/α^{2})
With the condensation process taking place by the weak
shock.
Physically, the condensation takes place in either
shock option at the intersection of two enrays in an energy flow (Mach lines,
shocks, quarks, etc.). Furthermore, since the tgo interacting enrays must be of
unequal strength ( i.e. having unequal slopes on the spacetime diagram), then
a third phenomena – a contact discontinuity line D emerges.
In standard quantum mechanics, electric charge has
some formal resemblance to angular momentum, which, however, is considered to
be only a mathematical coincidence; in the new theory, electric charge has a
physical origin in vortex motion.
4.1.2 VORTICITY AT A CONTACT DISCONINUITY
In the case of a compressible flow interaction, we
have
2ω =
∂V/∂N (1/ρV)
∂p/∂N
(1)
where N is a space direction normal to the flow
streamlines, ω is the rotation and p is the pressure.
In the case of two intersecting pressure pulses
(waves) we have
2ω =
11/V [ T ∂S/∂N  ∂h_{o}/∂N ]
(2)
h_{o} is the stagnation enthalpy ( h = U +
pv), T is the temperature. The vorticity
then depends on the rate of change of entropy and stagnation enthalpy normal to
the flow directions.
4.1.3 ENTROPY AND CHARGE
In quantum theory, the charge e^{}, has the
nature of an electromagnetic force coupling constant (e^{} = g_{e}). The square of the charge constant is equal to
the square of the fine structure constant of the atom:
e^{2}
= g_{e}^{2} = e2/ћc = α^{2} = [1/11.7]^{2
} = 1/137
(3)
But, (Sect. 3.11), the fine structure constant α
is also an entropy, and we have , when n := 8
and (n + 1) = 9 :
ΔS = ( ln
8! + ln 9!)/2 = α ≈ [ 1/11.7]
3a)
The entropy change across a contact discontinuity
resulting from the interactin of tdwo unequal generating sshocks, or unequal
characteristics, (ψ^{+}_{1,2}), is also a measure of
electgric charge e^{}.
4.1.4 ENTROPY AND PRESSURE RATIO
ΔS = S_{2}
–S_{1} = R ln(p_{02}/p_{01})
(4)
4.1.5 COMPRESSIBLE POTENTIAL VORTEX (CPV)
Vr =
const.
(5a)
R*/r_{min}
= [n+1]^{1/2
}(5b)
V_{max}
= n^{1/2} c_{o
}(5c)
4.1.5.1
In the compressible potentiall votex (CPV), we have
λ _{c}
= n^{1/2} r_{min} ; r_{min}
= λ_{c}/n^{1/2
}(6)
r* = λ_{c}
[ (n+1)/n]^{1/2
}(7)
r_{Bohr}
= λ_{?} (1/α^{2})
(8)
4.1.6 ELECTRON VORTEX PRESSURE
c/c_{o}
= (p/p_{o})^{1/(n+2)} = [ 1 – 1/n{V/c_{o}}^{2}]^{1/2}
(9)
4.1.7 MODEL OF THE HYDROGEN ATOM
We have two vortex flows and their combinations:
A) THE ROTATIONAL VORTEX (RV)
V _{T}/r
= const; V _{T} = rω =
(Г/2π)r
(14)?
At the rim of the vortex: V _{T} = V_{max} = n^{1/2} c_{o}.
B) THE COMPRESSIBLE POTENTIAL VORTEX (CPV)
V_{T}
r = const.; r_{min} = λ_{c}/ n^{1/2}
(see Sect. 4.1.5).
C) THE HYDROGEN ATOM: (NUCLEUS + ELECTRON)
Various combinations of A and B above may be
considered for a model of the atom. We
present here a double CPV model, with the nucleus being a CPV of dimensions
approximately 10^{15 }m , surrounding an electron CPV with a radius
which is approximately the Bohr radius ( 10^{10} m).
4.1.8 de BROGLIE WAVELENGTH, λ_{de B}
λ_{de
B} = 2πλ_{c}[c/V]
(15)?
Wgere c/V is the invcerse Mach number (1/M) of the
energiy flow.
Λ_{c}
= [λ_{de B}/2π]
V/c (16)?
4.2 ELECTROSTATIC FIELD
A stationary charge is surrounded by an electrostatic
field, which, on the new theory, consists of a field of virtual photons
emanating from the CPV of the electron.
The virtual photons are Mach line characteristics of the flow, emitted
symmetrically into space in the near field surrounding the electron. The characteristics terminate on a sink (
i.e. on another charge) confined to the near field, that is to within one wavelength. These curved characteristics are identified
with the electromagnetic field lines. The curvature of the characteristics in
spacetime reveals the existence of force in a compressible flow (Sect. 3.4).
4.3 MAGNETISM: THE COMPRESSED VIRTUAL PHOTON
FIELD OF A MOVING CHARGE
The electric field of a moving charge is compressed in
the direction of the motion: a
solenoidal magnetic field then emerges
as a relatsivity ( i.e. compressibility ) effect (Sect. 5.2).
4.4 ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION
A stationary charge has a symmetrical, virtual photon
field; a uniformly moving charge has a
compressed virtual photon field which generates a solenoidal magnetic field; an
accelerated charge represents a discontinuity ( or pulse) in virtual photon
concentration. When the charge is
accelerated, this concentrative gradient in the virtual photon field detaches
itself from the charge or charges, (source or sink) and travels outwards as a
set of photons which are no longer virtual but real. Maxwell’s classical equations for the
electromagnetic field follow naturally (Sect. 4.5.1).
4.5 THE PHOTON STRUCTURE
When two characteristics interact ( sect. 2.19), for
example in socalled corner flow, they encounter a structural flow ambiguity
which is resolved by the formation of a shock.
When three characteristics interact, they for a
cusp/envelope region in the flow and the three characteristics then meet at a
point/ There is again an ambiguity in the flow.
The ambiguity at the crossing point of the three
characteristics is resolved by a 360°rotation or spin, and the transverse,
rotating vector constitutes the photon.
4.5.1 CUSP VECTOR FIELD (NONCOPLANAR)
Three, noncoplanar vectors combine to give
Ψ_{1} x (ψ_{2} + ψ_{3})
= (ψ_{1 }. ψ_{3}ψ_{2}) – (ψ_{1}
. ψ_{2}ψ_{3})
Which is the curl of a vector field, B = curl A: so that
Curl B = curl curl A = Ñ( Ñ x A) = Ñ×ÑA  ÑÑA
= grad div A  Ñ^{2}A
This connects the three characteristics of the
compressible flow ( i.e. three noncoplanar vectors) in the new theory with
Maxwell’s equations:
Ñ X E = 1/c ∂B/∂t div E = D
(17)
Ñ X B = 1/c ∂E/∂t div B = 0
(17)
4.5.2 PHOTON ENERGY
ε = hν = cV
(18)
h = (c/ν)V = λV
But, for the photon, V = c_{o}, and so
H = λ(m)V
= λp
which is the de Broglie equation for the photon.
4.5.3 PHOTON SPEED
In the energy equation for 1dimensionl motion, n
equals unity, and we have
c^{2}
= c_{o}^{2} – V^{2} , and so
V_{max}
= n^{1/2} c_{o }= c_{o}
The photon speed V_{γ} is, therefore, the
escape velocity to a vacuum V_{max}
which equals c_{o} (= 3 x 10^{8} m/s).
In free space the photon speed corresponds to V_{i}, the
particle speed of the flow. In matter, or in interactions with matter, the
photon speed corresponds to V, the local relative flow speed (Sect. 4.7.1).
4.5.4 RELATIVISTIC FORM
The above 3vector description of the photon equation
I classical Maxwellian form for a sokple cokmpressible flow an be cast in
relativistic form by introducing the 4vector potential A^{μ}
A^{μ}
= A(x,y,z,φ)
Where φ is the velocity potential.
4.5.5 PHOTON SPIN
Spin involves an analysis of the streamline ambiguity
which arises from some flow reflections, the relationship between the
streamline directions and the characteristic direction requires that a
2cmponent flow undergoes a 180° ‘flip’ or spin upon reflection of the flow
(Sect. 3.14).
A 3component flow, such as for the photon, requires a 360° rotation or
spin upon reflection. This agrees with the usual spin equation, where N is the
number of flow components:
2S + 1 = N
For example, if N = 3, we have S = 1, and this
corresponds to the photon spin.
4.6 THE MICHELSONMORLEY EXPERIMENT
In compressible flow theory, the flow velocity V in
the energy equation
c^{2}
= c_{o}^{2} – V^{2}/n
is always purely relative, and this same equation also
yields the Fitzgerald contraction factor (Sect. 5.2.1), ( provided that n in
the energy equation is equal to unity, for example for 1dimensional motions):
c/c_{o}
= [ 1 – (V/c_{o})^{2}]^{1/2}
Thus, since only relative velocity V enters, there are
no absolute motions involved which can effect the system; the observed null
result of the MichelsonMorley experiment is therefore to he expected as a
simple consequence of the existence of compressibility in the energy flow. Note also that in compressible flow theory,
the M/M experiment is also seen as an isentropic process.
4.7 SOME OPTICAL EFFECTS AND THE FIZEAU
EFFECT
4.7.1 THE REFRACTIVE INDEX N
The standard definition of the refractive index N is
So that N is the ratio of the speed of light in vacuum
to the speed in some optical medium.
To express N physically as a compressibility
phenomenon, we proceed as follows:
c^{2}
= c_{o}^{2} –V^{2}/n
from which we have the following relationships
c = [c_{o}^{2}
– V^{2}/n]^{1/2}
c/c_{o} = [1 – 1/n (V/c_{o)}^{2} ]^{1/2}
V = [nc_{o}^{2} – nc^{2}]^{1/2} V/c_{o} = [1 – (c/c_{o})^{2}]^{1/2}
And, for V = c = c* , we have c* = V*
c*/c_{o}
= [n/(n + 1)]^{1/2}
Finally, we put
N≡ V_{o}/V_{i}
Where V_{o} is the speed of photons in vacuum,
and V_{i} is the speed of photons in the optical medium.. We therefore
have expressed N in terms of two compressible flow velocities.
Note that the photon speed, or speed of light, is not
identified with the wave speeds, c or c_{o}, but with the relative flow
velocity V instead. However, the energy of the photon involves the wave speed c
and the relative flow velocity V ( Sect. 3.6).
Now, the ratio of the two speeds of flow V_{o}/V_{i}
has the identical form of the left hand side of the Prandtl equation for the
flow velocity transformation across a normal shock front, namely
V_{o}/V_{i}
= c*^{2} / V_{o}^{2}
And, if V_{o} = c_{o, }then also
V_{o}/V_{i}
= c*^{2}/c_{o}^{2} = (n+1)/n
But we have
set V_{o}/V_{i} equal to the refractive index N and so we also
have
N = V_{o}/V_{i}
= (n+1)/n
relating the refractive indeed N to the compressible
flow parameter n.
Thus the reduction in the speed of light in an optical
medium having refractive index N with respect to the speed of light in space is
explainable physically as a reduction in an upstream compressible flow velocity
V_{o} relative to a downstream flow velocity V_{i} across a
normal shock front occurring in a compressible energy flow, these two flow
velocities being identified with the photon velocities outside and inside the
optical medium.
The relationship N = (n+1)/n Is shown in the following
table for integral vales of n:
Degrees of
Freedom n versus
Refractive
Index N
n N
1 2
2 1.5
3 1.33
∞ 1
We note that the predicted range of the values for N,
corresponding to simple vales of n ranging from 1dimensionlal flow to
3dimensional flow, covers the known values for N for over 99% of all optical
media where N lies between 4/3 and 2. The convention of making N for free space
equal to unity also corresponds to a value for n of infinity, and this is the
value for a pure field. The
electromagnetic shock hypothesis thus yields a prediction for the value of N
corresponding to observed data. We
conclude that N is in fact, physically based in a normal shock transition
across the interface between an optical medium and free space.
We reiterate that the speed of light V_{o }in
space ( = 3 x 10^{10} m/s) is a flow speed and not c_{o}, the
free –space wave speed; the speed of light V_{i} in the medium is again
the flow speed and not the wave speed c_{i} . The wave/particle nature of the photon is,
however, not affected by this since the photon energy is given by the product
of c the wave speed and V the particle speed ( ε = hν = 2cV) (Sect.
3.6)) .
Refractive indices intermediate in value between the
values in the table should be explainable in terms of flows of mixed
dimensionality. Media with N less than 1
or greater than 2 would involve either fractional degrees of flow freedom or
flows of dimensionality higher than three.
In interpreting the mechanism further, it is worth
noting tht the interface between an optical medium and space is, on the atomic
scale, not ‘flat’, and so a transition interfacial state should be considered
in any detailed or rigorous modeling.
4.7.2 THE FIZEAU EFFECT
The above derivation of N refers to stationary optical
media. When the optical medium moves,
(e.g. flowing water), then the experimentally observed fractional addition of
velocity to the speed of light caused by the speed of the medium V_{m}
is usually explained as a relativity effect which can be calculated from the
Lorentz/Einstein velocityaddition formula for transformation of velocities
between coordinate systems in uniform relative motion:
V = [c_{o}/N
+ V_{m] }/ [ 1 + (c_{o}V_{m}/N)/c_{o}^{2}]
Which, when expanded as a power series in V/c_{o},
gives
c_{o}/N
+ V_{m}[ 1 – 1/N^{2}]
where the bracketed factor is the Fresnel drag
coefficient.
This drag coefficient, however, is an isentropic flow
factor derived from the compressible energy equation, since
(c/c_{o})^{2}
= 1 – 1/n (V/c_{o})^{2}
If n = 1 (1dimensional flow) then (V/c_{o})^{2}
= 1/N^{2}, so that
Fresnel/Einstein drag coefficient.
This raises a logical problem, because, if the index
of refraction N is to be explained by a shock mechanism for a stationary flow,
then this is a nonisentropic process.
Why then is the additionofvelocity drag formula for a moving medium
explained by an isentropic flow formula?
In the past, it has been proposed that there are observable
discrepancies in the experimental data, which
in fact point to a failure of the isentropic Fresnel/Einstein drag
formula for moving media, and which argue instead for a shock transition
formula for moving media as being the correct one. Another possible explanation lies in the
wellknown fact that, for weak shocks the differences between the
nonisentropic or shock formula and the purely isentropic formulae show up only
in terms higher than second order in the shock strength. Shocks involved in compressible theory for
values of N between 4/3 and 2 would be relatively weak, and so the numerical
differences in the predictions of the two mechanisms  isentropic and
nonisentropic would be small.
It is pointed out that the Fizeau effect, unlike the
Michelson and Morley effect, is first
order in (V/c) and is readily observable; it merits further analysis,
and the experimental discrepancies should be carefully examined in the light of
the various possible mechanisms involved.
4.7.3 FERMAT’S LEAST TIME PRIINCIPLE FOR
OPTICAL RAYS
In classical mechanics,
δò L dt = o
where L is the Lagrangian function.
But, in our new theory L = cV (Sect. 3.6C), and so
δò L dt = δò Vc dt = δò V ds =0
where ds is the invariant metric interval. In such systems, for example simple harmonic
motions, L varies constantly or periodically and so, therefore, do c and V.
But, in a homogeneous optical medium, c and V are constant,
and so we must put
δò L dt = δò cv dt = δò dt = 0
which is Fermat’s principle of a least time path for
optical rays.
Both Hamilton’s principle and Fermat’s can be derived
from the cV term in the unsteady flow compressible energy equation; if cV varies,
Hamilton’s least action result, if cV is constant, Fermat’s least time applies.
4.8 THE SAGNAC EFFECT
In this interesting effect, an interferometer is
rotated and a fringe shift δ is then observed which is given by
Δ =
(4Ώ A)/λ_{o}c_{o}) (28)
Where A is the area enclosed by the light path, Ώ
is the angular rate of rotation, λ_{o} and c_{o} are free
space values.
4.9 DE BROGLIE EQUATION
In the de Broglie equation λ = h/p = h/mV, upon setting ε = hν = (m) c^{2}. we
obtain the equation
u_{p}v_{g} = c_{o}^{2}
This derivation requires that the phase velocity u_{p}
should exceed c_{o} when v_{g} is small.
The new theory ( Sect. 3.6B) has, however, put
ε
= cV
instead of ε = (m) c^{2}.
From the unsteady state energy equation we get _{ .}
c^{2} = c_{o}^{2} – V^{2}/n – 2cV/n, or_{}
cV =
n[c_{o}^{2}/2 – c^{2}/2 –V^{2}/2]
instead of u_{p}v_{g = }c_{o}^{2}.
The supercritical phase speeds which emerge from the
customary de Broglie derivation are avoided.
Note that cV emerges as a :sum of kinetic energy terms in c_{o},
c and V.
4.10 THE PERIODIC TABLE
We have seen (Sects. 3.6B; 4.1.5.1; 4.1.8) that
( de Broglie wavelength):
λ_{de B} =
h/m/λ
(
so that
λ_{c}/λ_{de B} = V/c
It is interesting that, if we now set
N λ_{de
B} = 2π r_{e
}(29)
We have
λ_{de
B} = (2π/N) r_{e }(29a)
where N is a quantum number equal to 1,2,3….2π,
and r_{e} is an electron radius.
E valuating (2π/N) we get the following table:
N
(2π/N) Electron
Shell
1 0.15915 K
2 0.31831 L
3 0.47746 M
4 0.63682 N
5 0.79577 O
6 0.95493 P
2π 1.00000 Q
We see that there are only seven possible
configurations available from Equation 29, if N is a positive integral quantum
number and r_{e} ≤ λ_{de B}.
This, and Eq. 29 are, of course, just the Bohr model
of the atom, except that the model has now been related to a compressible
(vortex) flow.
The full quantum theory of the atom requires the
Schrodinger equation ( Sect. 3.7.1), which has its compressibility basis in the
quantum operators for momentum and position as given in Sect. 3.6D.
5. RELATIVITY:
A COMPRESSIBILITY EFFECT
5.1 GALILEAN RELATIVITY
Communication signals are instantaneous (c = ∞
). Transformations are as follows:
l =
l′ y = y′ t = t′ V′ = V_{1} + V_{2}
z = z ′
x = x′ +
vt
5.2 SPECIAL RELATIVITY (Relativity of uniform motion)
Signals travel at a finite speed (c ‹ ∞ ), that is,
at the speed of light (3 x 10^{8} m/s) in free space.
The present theory identifies a finite speed of light
as a physicallybased compressibility effect.
The photon speed is now explained as a flow velocity.
The free space speed is Vγ = 3 x 10 m/s. From the basic energy equation
c^{2}
= c_{o}^{2} – V^{2}/n
(1)
we see that V can only equal c_{o} if n = 1
and c = 0; this is the condition where V_{γ} = V_{max} the
escape speed to vacuum.
The wave speed c is a local variable determined by V
and vice versa. The wave/particle nature
of the photon is evidenced in the new theory since the photon energy is
Ε =
hν = 2cV
So that it depends on both a wave speed c and a
particle of flow speed V. (Sect. 3.6).
If an arbitrary choice is then made to assume an
inertial coordinate system, namely one ‘at rest’, then the wave speed in free
space c_{o} (numerically equal to the speed of light V_{γ}
in free space) becomes equal to the free space speed of light relative to the
inertial system, and the variable wave speed c becomes transferred from the
inertial system to any other system moving at relative speed V. The famous postulate of the ‘constancy of the
speed of light in vacuum for all inertial observers’ has its roots in this
essentially arbitrary choice in the compressible energy equation.
5.2.1 THE FITZGERALD CONTRACTION FACTOR
This follows from the steady state energy equation (1)
c^{2}
= c_{o}^{2} – (1/n) V^{2
}(1)
where, for 1dimensional flow where n = 1, we have
c^{2}
= c_{o}^{2} – V^{2}, and
c/c_{0}
= [1 – (V/c_{o})^{2}]^{1/2 } ^{ }(2)
which is the Fitzgerald contraction factor, and which
is now seen being a compressibility ratio of wave speeds.
5.2.2 THE LORENTZ TRANSFORMATIONS
These now become a series of simple, kinematic, compressibility
ratios, all equal to the wave speed
ratio c/c_{o}, as follows:
c/c_{o}
= l′/l = dt′/dt = dτ/dt = x′/(x – vt) = t′/(t
–(vx)/c_{o}^{2}) = W/W_{o} = E_{o}/E = m_{o}/m
= F_{o}/F =
= λ/λ′ = ν/ν′ = p/p_{o} = T/T_{o}_{
}(3)
where τ is the
proper time, W is work, E is energy, m is mass, F is force, λ is wavelength, ν is
frequency, p is momentum, T is
temperature.
Since c/c_{o} is also the fundamental
isentropic ratio, giving all the thermodynamic ratio values for pressure,
density and temperature , (see Sect. 2.9), the new theory now relates the
Lorentz transformations to these thermodynamic ratios, as well as to quantum
physics via the quantum state variables, c/c_{o} and V/c_{o}
(Sect. 3.8).
In (b) above the variables c_{o}t and Vt are
numerically identical to Minkowski’s c and x, but they are conceptually very
different; they are now physicallybased, compressibility quantities involving
the quantum state variables.
The metric interval is
ds = c dt
(4)
where c is now the local
wave speed calculated from the energy equation (1), and dt is the local time
differential.
We derive the metric interval ds from the energy
equation as follows ( for n = 1): In the energy equation (1) c_{o} is
constant and the equation is elliptical in c and V. Multiplying through by t^{2}, we have
c^{2}t^{2}
= c_{o}^{2}t^{2}
– v^{2}t^{2}
which is now
hyperbolic in the variables c_{o}t and vt, with ct becoming the
constant. Hence we have
c_{o}^{2}t^{2}
–V^{2}t^{2} = c^{2}t^{2} = s^{2} =
const,
5.2.3 THE RELATIVISTIC HAMILTONIAN
The standard form: H^{2} = c_{o}^{2}p^{2} + m_{o}^{2}c_{o}^{4}
is not quite correct, although the error is very small in most cases. Instead,
H^{2}
= c^{2}p^{2} + m_{o}^{2}c_{o}^{2}c^{2
}(5)
Or,
H^{2}
= c^{2}p^{2} + m^{2}c^{4 }(6)
Here, the c’s are the local wave speeds, and m is
the relativistic mass. The c’s are as
calculated from the energy equation (1), and c_{o} iss 3 x 10^{8}
m/s as usual.
Setting p =
m_{o}V[1 – (V/c_{o})^{2} ]^{1/2} , we have H =
(m_{o})c_{o}^{2}, which is a static invariant energy.
(Compare this with L = 2cV in Sect. 3.6C).
5.2.4 THE EINSTEIN FORMULATION OF SPECIAL
RELATIVITY
Postulate 1:
The laws of physics are the same for all inertial observers.
Postulate 21:
The speed of light is constant (c = 3 x 10^{8 } (Sect. 3.8). for all inertial observers, even
those in uniform relative motion with respect to one another.
Postulate 2 has no physical basis, and the Lorentz
transformations follow as a consequence of the ‘absolute’ nature of spacetime.
5.2.5 THE COMPRESSIBILITY FORMULATION OF SPECIAL
RELATIVITY
The wave speed c is a local variable given by the
compressible energy equation (1). It may arbitrarily be set to c = c_{o}
( = 3x10^{8}m/s) by any inertial observe r, thus transferring the
variable local wave speed to any other observers in uniform relative motion.
The Lorentz transformations are simple, physically
based, compressibility ratios equal to c/c_{o} (Sect. 5.2).
The Fitzgerald contraction factor is now this same
compressibility ratio c/c_{o} (Sect. 5.2.1).
The compressibility ratio c/c_{o} is now a
quantum state variable (Sect. 3.8).
Space and time, and spacetime have no absolute
character, nor any physical character apart from the energy forms ( particles).
Spacetime is simply the natural graphical expression of the compressibility
relations which involve distance and time.
The compressibility formulation and the Einstein
formulation of special relativity yield identical numerical results for most
cases of uniform motion. Exceptions are
the Hamiltonian energy (Sect. 5.2.3) and the Fizeau Effect (Sect. 4.7.2).
A subtlety of nature in this matter, which has been
the hidden source of great perplexity, is that the speed of light in free space
is not a wave speed at all, but is,
instead, a particle or photon speed V_{γ }, (which is, however,
numerically equal to the freespace wave speed c_{o}, since, for n = 1,
we have V_{max} = n^{1/2}
c_{o} = c_{o} = Vγ ).
Yet, upon its interception or measurement, the photon again regenerates
its wavelike properties and a local or variable wave speed c reappears (See
Sect. 4.7.1).
5.2.6 TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL MASS
There is only one relativistic mass, m =m_{o}(c/c_{o}).
The so=called ‘longitudinal mass’
M = m_{o}]
1 – (V/c_{o})^{2}]^{1/2}
(7)
Is now a force correction tgerm (see Sect. 6.1.1).
5.3 GENERAL RELATIVITY
In compressible flow, forces, when present, introduce
a curvature of the characteristics on the spacetime diagram; spacetime curvature thus indicates
acceleration and the presence of force.
In compressible flow, the forces are both physically
real and fully relativistic. They may be
‘transformed away’ if desired, by choosing a Lagrangian coordinate system which
moves with the relative flow so as to make V = o and c = c_{o} in the
basic energy equation (1).
The relationship of the Lagrangian coordinate
system to the spacetime coordinate
system is one of distortion; that is to say, it is a tensorial relationship.
The transformation
h = x(h,t); h
= h)x,t)
(8)
between the two systems represents a distortion in the
relativistic, spacetime, graphical representation. Here, dh = c dt = ds.
The analogous (tensorial) distortion of 4space
(x,y,z,t) in general relativity – which is needed in order to obtain a
forcefree representation is valid, but ‘curved spacetime’ is a graphical
concept only in compressibility terms, and has no physical foundation or
physical reality. The particle path curvature in 3space is real; the absence
of curvature (force) in a Lagrangian system is a purely computational or
representational option, and its value is to be judged solely on its utility or
convenience, and not on any supposed insights it may offer into the nature of
physical reality.
The ‘forcefree’ condition is
∫ds =
∫dh = ∫c dt =0
(9)
In general relatatvity, ds , the geodesic arc element,
is
ds^{2}
= ∑g_{ij}^{dx}_{i}dx_{j
}(10)
The fundamental equation of general relativity, needed
to gve force free motions, is therefore
δ∫
ds = 0
(11)
or, expressed as a tensor,
d^{2}x_{μ}/ds^{2} +
Г (dx_{μ}ds)(dx_{ν}/ds) = 0
(12)
General relativity is a continuous field theory, and
as such, excludes discontinuities or singularities. Therefore, it appears to be fundamentally incompatible
with quantum physics, where we have shown shock discontinuities to be the
physical basis for the emergence of the particles of matter from compressible
energy flows (Sect. 3.9).
General relativity is compatible with the restricted
field of isentropic, classical mechanical motions, and of isentropic, optical
ray curvatures ( bending of light rays near gravitating masses).
Spacetime coordinates arise from the introduction of
the relative velocity V in the compressible energy equation (1). Socalled
spacetime ‘warping’ is a coordinate effect, tat is to say it is a purely
graphical distortion in the depiction of an accelerated, compressible energy
flow.
General relativity is a valid computational means for
accelerated flows in a compressible field such as that of electromagnetic
radiation which has a finite signal speed.
But in the new quantum theory
of gravitation ( see Sect. 6.3), which is essentially beyond the spacetime
‘event horizon’ of relativity, it would appear to be inapplicable.
6. GRAVITATION AND COSMOLOGY
6.0 Since the new theory has been successful in
reformulating quantum physics on a new basis and unifying it with relativity
theory, it is natural to apply it to gravitation. We shall now see that it offers a new quantum
theory of gravitation , and a new cosmology.
6.1 FORCE IN COMPRESSIBILITY TERMS
The basic compressibility force equation, expressed in
terms of wave and flow velocities is
F = dp/dt = m_{o}/[1 – (V/c_{o})^{2}]^{1/2}dV/dt
+ m_{o}V d[1 – (V/c_{o})^{2}]^{2}/dt
= m_{o}
(c_{o}/c) [a (1 + m^{2})]
(1)
where M = V/c is the Mach number of the flow, p is the
momentum, m_{o} is the rest mass, a is the acceleration and c/c_{o}
is the Fitzgerald contraction factor ( Sect. 5.2.1).
If we set p = ε/c, we get
F = d(ε/c)/dt
F = 1/c dε/dt – (ε/c^{2}) dc/dt
(1a)
6.1.1 ‘LONGITUDINAL MASS’
The longstanding puzzle of the socalled
‘longitudinal mass’ in relativity theory *Sect. 5.2.6), namely,
m = m_{o}[1 (V/c_{o})]^{1/2
}(2)
no longer remains.
There is only one (relativistic) mass, which is
m = m_{o}(c/c_{o})
(3)
Instead of mass, it is now force which has a
compressibility correction term in the square of the Mach number M^{2},
and it can also be shown that it is this correction which introduces the 3/2
power factor in Eq.2 when the velocity and the acceleration are not colinear.
6.1.2 FORCE IN PRESSURE GRADIENT TERMS
F =  1/ρ dp/dx ( = 1/ρ Ñp, in general)
(4)
For n = 1 (k = 3):
F_{p} = 1/3 (c^{2}/p) Ñp: p =
1/3 ρc^{2}
For n = 2 (k = 2)´
F_{p} = 1/2 (c^{2}/p) Ñp: p =
1/2 ρc^{2}
6.1.3 WAVE SPEED,
C
c^{2} = k p/ρ = (n+2)/n p/ρ
(5a)
where 1/ρ = v = c^{2}/kp, and so
c^{2} = c_{o}^{2} –V^{2}/n
= k p/ρ
(5)
6.2 DERIVATION AND DIMENSIONS OF THE
GRAVITATIONAL CONSTANT G
From Sect. 3.5 and 3.6, where we introduced the
electromagnetic vibrational energy ε_{h} at a point in space (
i.r. for a particle), we saw that
Ε_{h} = cV = hν
(6)
Now, for gravitational energy ε_{g}
attracting over the space intervening between masses, we can, by symmetry,
write
Ε_{g} = cV = Gk
(7)
where k = 1/λ is the wave number in tht space.
If cV is the same in both Eqs. (6) and (7), then
Ε_{g}/ε_{h} = cV/cV = 1 =
Gk/hν
(G/h) (k/ν) = 1
G/(h λν) = G/hc = 1
G/h = c (8)
Where G has the dimensions of energy times length.
This can be compared with Planck’s constant h ,which has dimensions of energy
times time.
On the above derivation, Planck’s constant has a
relationship to vibrational energydensity at a point in time via he frequency
ν ( h = cV/ν); whereas the gravitational constant G relates to an
energydensity at point in space between gravitating masses via the wave length
λ (G = cV/λ).
6.2.1 GRAVITATIONAL WAVE SPEED
If we now insert the numerical values for h and G in
(8), we get for the wave speed c
C = G/h = (6.67 x 10^{11})(6.63 x 10^{34}
= 10^{23} m/s)
(9)
This raises the question: Can such an enormous wave
speed be possible?
To answer, we plot the ordinary, compressible wave
speed’s energy (c^{2}) from the
basic energy equation
c^{2} = c_{o}^{2} – V^{2}/n
(5)
where we have the familiar energy ellipse in quantum
variables c and V, or the linear plot in energy variables c^{2} and V^{2}: